Liberance
Well-Known Member
Though isn't that evidence that there's nothing of substance to do with the character other than break him down? That the story is over and the creative options exhausted. If you have to resort to using something as tonally drastic as that to tell your story, doesn't that fundamentally shift the story from heroic adventurer to old cranky sad guy with nothing to live for?
In a way, yeah. It's probably one of the main reasons Spielberg dropped out. He had already told the Dial of Destiny story with Crystal Skull trying his best not to break the formula in the process.
That said, there are always options. Maybe even Mangold's take could've been good by making it less grim. There's plenty of questionable stuff Indy has done in the past that could come back to bite him at the end. He's lived a double life as a respectable professor and borderline grave robber. I for one would love to read whatever the original Koepp script that Spielberg worked on was about.
so it's all just coincidence? Whether it's Rian Johnson, Mangold, Abrahms...Rogue One, Solo, The ST, Indy 5( four British, Protagonist, female actresses) , Mandalorian (Bo Katan)...the list goes on and on...Luke, Indy, Han...They just happen to write bad scripts under one common denominator..Kathleen Kennedy. If that makes me nuts to see it like that then i don't want to know what it's like to be "sane" because just like everything else, there is a reversal of truth happening out there. Good is now evil and evil is now good. Right is wrong and wrong is right. I'll stop here. If people can't see who and what is behind this then there is nothing i can do but to hope that they will see and see quickly. If we are just going to be indifferent about these things then complain about them happening, all while funding them to keep pumping more out then we are complicit in our own complaints. I mean when KK comes out and says, "The Force is female" Then Rey, Jyn, Qi'ra, Bo Katan, Helen...all portrayed like the cats meow but Luke, Han and Indy get poor scripts and debased and it's unfortunate? I just can't...appreciate your opinion. Thank You but none if it makes sense to me at all. No one thought the OT as being Male only...no one said back then "The Force is Male"...imagine if that was said today? But it's ok to say "The force is female". It was Kathleen Kennedy that introduced us to these things but it's not an agenda...huh?
I mean, honestly, what you're responding to are dumb PR decrees that executives like Kennedy feel like they have to parrot in order to look good in social media. And there definitely is a corporate push to bring more female characters to leading roles, which would be perfectly fine if done properly. The problem is that, rather than driven by artistic sensibilities, it mainly happens for marketing reasons and it's usually done in completely incompetent ways that result in trash like the new Ghostbusters and the like. The consequence of that is that the movies suck, the marketing intentions become obvious, audiences feel played, and then you get a number of people who start jumping at shadows whenever anything else doesn't work for whatever reason.
Rey is just as poorly executed in the new Star Wars movies as Finn, Kylo or the ginger lad who screams. Helena is actually less interesting than Indiana Jones in Dial of Destiny. The root of all this is poor writing and the usual creative interference in corporate environments, and not some complex political agenda. You're giving these studios far too much credit when the reality is much more mundane than all that.
Last edited: