Gigatron
Sr Member
While it was necessarily bad, I would says Cars was my least favorite. Just couldn't buy into the concept. I kept thinking things like, how can they reproduce? How did they evolve? etc...
Wouldn't that be the inherent problem with any of Pixar's movies, then? Did you question where other toys came from, in the Toy Story movies? You never saw Bo and Woody sneak off to do the nasty - and the movie even hinted at THEIR love-life. I don't recall anything in Cars that suggested baby cars or the need for reproduction.
In the land of Cars, cars are like people. Instead of being born, they're assembled. If you want to fantasize about their sex lives, they have tailpipes and dipsticks - do the math. When a mommy car and a daddy car are in love, he puts his dipstick in her tailpipe and 24 hours later (allowing time for the paint cure in the booth) a new baby car is born.
Where does their life force come from? Who knows? Where do the toys get their magical properties from? Where do rats go to learn english - in France, no less? What jobs did bugs have before they decided to run off and join the flea circus? How did the old man and the kid go to the bathroom while the house was loating around? The plumbing was ripped from the ground, so you can't flush, shower, wash your hands or a myriad of other problems not addressed by Pixar. You just have to let your imagination run wiold.
The point is, you can't hate a movie for the simple fact that something seems implausible - especially when the company's entire line-up of franchises is based on the implausible. If that's the case, you either love every movie, or hate every movie, equally. It's like saying; I like Superman: the movie, but hate Superman 2, because, in Superman 2, Superman flies.
-Fred