Documenting the HAL 9000 faceplates
- Thread starter 3Dsf
- Start date
That or we're seeing the attachment for the Nikkor lens and...no lensLots of set pics with that Pod and no HAL...
I considered that actually, but it turns out that it isn't the case. There are photos in the Archives that show that the pod bay EVA pods had fluted aluminium tubes with glass lenses inside those spots - they didn't have Nikkor lenses or lens mounts. I think there’s one or two shots from the 4K scan that show that also.
Only the attack sequence pod with the internal mechanisms for making the arms move, and the full-sized extra-detailed front panel, had Nikkor lenses.
Last edited:
joberg
Legendary Member
Right you are...but what I don't understand to this day is why SK decided to use that EVA Pod for the major scenes? Was it too complicated to affix that Nikkor lens in that front panel? You've mentioned that those lenses were probably rented during production...I mean insurance would've covered any damage/breakage of those lenses...right? Still a mystery to me Neil
Right you are...but what I don't understand to this day is why SK decided to use that EVA Pod for the major scenes? Was it too complicated to affix that Nikkor lens in that front panel? You've mentioned that those lenses were probably rented during production...I mean insurance would've covered any damage/breakage of those lenses...right? Still a mystery to me Neil
Well, we don't know for certain. There's no documentation that I've seen on the subject.
The most plausible theory is that the pod bay set was constructed, with its pods, and that the HAL-instigated murder scene had not been decided on, details-wise. It's known that they did go through various narrative ideas as to how Frank would be dispatched, and so on.
Then the actual murder scene was filmed later, reusing one of the full-sized pods built for the bay scene. It's at that point that Kubrick decided to show more clearly to the audience that HAL had the ability to see out from the pod using the pod's cameras, and so had a HAL lens installed on that full-sized prop. He then decided that the full-sized pods didn't look good enough for an extreme closeup of the HAL eye for the actual murder scene, and had another front panel built, with more greeblies and details.
This sequence of events would explain the two continuity errors in that sequence.
joberg
Legendary Member
Did you see that Pod (left side) or is this a fake pic?
That's why we never see the front of the Pod when it catches Poole; it's without HAL as we can see clearly on that pic. But back on the scene from Discovery cockpit, we're back at the original design, sans HAL. And last: then, one can extrapolate that the 1/6th scale model was also without the HAL details.
That's why we never see the front of the Pod when it catches Poole; it's without HAL as we can see clearly on that pic. But back on the scene from Discovery cockpit, we're back at the original design, sans HAL. And last: then, one can extrapolate that the 1/6th scale model was also without the HAL details.
Last edited:
I can assure you that that woman was never in the original film!
Also, that's a really strange photo. The background looks like a movie screenshot, but I've never seen any 2001 EVA pod with a flat panel on the front like that. There are numerous mistakes on that pod's front panel, in fact.
Also, that's a really strange photo. The background looks like a movie screenshot, but I've never seen any 2001 EVA pod with a flat panel on the front like that. There are numerous mistakes on that pod's front panel, in fact.
Last edited:
joberg
Legendary Member
Yes, the woman was never in the movie or publicity photos...and you're right; the Pod seems strange in the pic. I don't know if it's CGI or a montage...or?I can assure you that that woman was never in the original film!
Also, that's a really strange photo. The background looks like a movie screenshot, but I've never seen any 2001 EVA pod with a flat panel on the front like that. There are numerous mistakes on that pod's front panel, in fact.
Well, generally I think most people consider on-screen appearances to be canon, and in the case of the 2001 EVA pods, there are three different front panels seen in different scenes.
Unfortunately the Moebius EVA pod kit is an abbreviated version of the ultra-detailed attack version of the pod, but with some corners cut to lower production costs, plus some additional outright errors. The "trellis" detail to the right of the photo, for example, is a very crude approximation! Or that circle and triangle at the top? No idea where those came from! It's such a shame, as the kit isn't bad at first glance.
Last edited:
It would be fun to re-create that panel section only at a 1:1 scale
Many of the kit parts are known on that panel. Someone I was talking to was looking into making one.
Pyramidrep
Sr Member
Doing some research this morning on the Museum of the Moving Image website before I travel to New York next week, I came across this documentary discussion with Douglas Trumbull(R.I.P.) About 30 minutes in, Doug reveals tantalising views of his archive which will be of great interest here.Doug Trumbull has a lot of 2001 pics in his possession and wanted to do a video/documentary presentation about that material.
I think that the publication of the 2001 Taschen book put a stop to it...or maybe the permission for the rights to do so
I can only hope that the archive will be bequested to a public museum by Doug’s family, now he has sadly passed.
Last edited:
joberg
Legendary Member
I sure hope so Pyramidrep
Not only his inventions in terms of engineering new types of camera/electronic/tech, but also, as you said, his incredible collection of photos showing all of his various film projects he did along the years.
I've updated my writeup on the HAL 9000 logotype and the font that was used, for those interested:
sites.google.com
The Age of Plastic - The HAL 9000 Logotype
HAL 9000: the logotype that’s hard to get right! The HAL branding is emblazoned on all the computer faceplates aboard the Discovery spacecraft in 2001. Although a bit dated today, the logotype convincingly conveys the solid corporate look of mid 1960s data processing equipment. And it’s really
sites.google.com
joberg
Legendary Member
Great detective work, as always, NeilI've updated my writeup on the HAL 9000 logotype and the font that was used, for those interested:
The Age of Plastic - The HAL 9000 Logotype
HAL 9000: the logotype that’s hard to get right! The HAL branding is emblazoned on all the computer faceplates aboard the Discovery spacecraft in 2001. Although a bit dated today, the logotype convincingly conveys the solid corporate look of mid 1960s data processing equipment. And it’s really
. I'll search my stash of original Letraset sheet to see if I have that font
