TronGod
Active Member
My guess will be $52 bucks or more a monthI want it to really be just 40 USD a month... but I'm thinking a bit more?
My guess will be $52 bucks or more a monthI want it to really be just 40 USD a month... but I'm thinking a bit more?
.......Uhhh.....I hope that was the earlier test oneI'm rapidly going off this,,,,,That interior is borderline pointless and worse than a toy and though this doesn't look like the paint job that comes with the model it does really detract from the build and makes it look even more amateur. Its a shame that got it so close but it is worrying me now...well i say worry...its more meh!!! This looks like a repaint by my daughter so wonder if this was for a repaint guide as that has been mentioned?
View attachment 426320
Well..I can't say the gun turret looks to be chrome...so its not the default paint job.......Uhhh.....I hope that was the earlier test one
http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/62660311_disgusted_gif.gif
J
I've just been told it was discussed on the official site and think it is V1 hopefully
To be honest..I'd rather the thing be cheaper by not having the inside..I know I will look at the insides 1 or 2 times and then never bother again"the Dodgy image" - at least the slanted sidewalls of the turret are correct
Well I secured a source in the UK to import the issues for me. I will also get one from the US distribution when it pops. I think the interior looks cool but needs to be "dirtied up". The Exterior looks like it needs a repaint. but I will reserve judgment on it until its in my hands. It looks like a GREAT project I am VERY much looking forward to it.
Jedi Dade
However wrong this model is....it's way better than spending $7,000 on ebay for a MR oneIf the 'Dodgy Image' is V2,....there could be a bit of work to try & make this Falcon accurate,.....unless the collection is a V3???
The window frames on the cockpit look completely off & even worse when the windows are in,.....this cockpit here looks like a toy.....some details that are supposed to overhang don't:
http://i1373.photobucket.com/albums...nnium-Falcon-Magazine-Model-3_zpsc1e9ef19.jpg
Going by the images in issue one, on the cover there is an overhang of the hull to the mandible,.....but something wasn't right,.....the F1 Elf boxes on the hull are toeing in with the mandibles when they should run out pointing out level:
http://i1373.photobucket.com/albums/ag383/jaitea1/F1direction_zps801af5a2.jpg
http://i1373.photobucket.com/albums/ag383/jaitea1/Unknown_zps5352a0b6.png
Heres the image of the front cover compared to the 32' model used to advertise the DeAgodtini:
http://i1373.photobucket.com/albums/ag383/jaitea1/MagFront_zps02e4316a.jpg
.....as the famous saying goes "I have a bad feeling about this",.....my opinion is if anyone thinks they will possess a 32' replica as good as the Master Replicas Falcon they will be disappointed,....looking at this front end image the FineMolds model ticks more boxes than the DeAgostini
J
One of the main problems with the DeAgostini Falcon from the start is that we have NEVER really seen the actual model. During the initial release they were using images of an customized (repainted & decal'd) Master Replicas Falcon (which is also, I believe, the one being shown on the magazines). On the website it is just a 3D render of the falcon, not the actual model.
They released a few parts that were then replaced with upgraded parts during the next release. So, as of yet we have no real reference for what it will look like yet, other that the latest 'dodgy'' images showing the interior, which does seem to show 'v2' parts.
I for one would like to see an official image of the actual completed kit as it would look finished, Just so I could see if it would be worth the price.
One of the main problems with the DeAgostini Falcon from the start is that we have NEVER really seen the actual model. During the initial release they were using images of an customized (repainted & decal'd) Master Replicas Falcon (which is also, I believe, the one being shown on the magazines). On the website it is just a 3D render of the falcon, not the actual model.
They released a few parts that were then replaced with upgraded parts during the next release. So, as of yet we have no real reference for what it will look like yet, other that the latest 'dodgy'' images showing the interior, which does seem to show 'v2' parts.
I for one would like to see an official image of the actual completed kit as it would look finished, Just so I could see if it would be worth the price.
They might be ok for spoiled kids or people not that bothered about how accurate it is.
I think things so far point to this not being a good idea for the discerning collector.
Also what has to be considered is the fact that I don't think these type of magazine build-a-bit-at-a-time things have a good track record of going the full term.
I agree we may not have actually seen what this final model looks like...its possible the parts are still being adjusted as they go. I can't also help but wonder if some people aren't eager to trash this model a bit too soon,unless it's a way to talk themselves out of ordering one.... As long as the model is the right proportions it should be easy to make a new part .to replace a wrong one. The USA web page does in fact have 2 options for a lot of their models...1 lump sum,get the whole thing, or 2 a bit at a time. I would suspect the falcon will go to LUMP SUM option after a bit.Can you expand on the last statement? The 'build at a time' scenario is new to us Americans, but Ive seen it for years in Europe. Has Deagostini dropped the ball before? Also, Ive seen their US website.....you can order the whole model (Mclaren F1) for a lump sum. Does that mean the whole model shows up or you still have to wait month after month.
Regardless, I like that this is build-able model that you can take apart and put back together. IE if you dont like a certain part, pull it off and replace with suitable greeblies.
The pictures on the back cover of the holding card for the mag and parts of issue one is of the MR.
The two MR versions I had, both exhibited these problems with the F1 Elf boxes - one being an AP.
The lack of undercuts is a worry though.