I've shown this image in particular as it represents "true" black colour comparison to that of the black Canon camera - The Canon camera effectively acting as a control variable or constant, showing the colours, contrast and brightness are true and have been unchanged and unaltered. The Canon camera has both matt and gloss black parts.
By showing the frames
right alongside the Canon camera which we know to be 100% black in colour, we can establish the colours, contrast and brightness are accurate and unaltered in the image.
Here is my gloss black frame with light grey marble on the inside of the frame...
Now look what happens to the same "true colour" image when the contrast and brightness are altered...
The frame no longer appears gloss black, the altered brightness and contrast have accentuated and lightened
only the lighter gloss reflections to look similar to havana striations or areas of differences in colour, giving a misleading representation of the actual true colour, the deep gloss black finish no longer appearing even and constant across the frame surface, even though the even gloss black colour 100% exists in reality.
There aren't any light olive or havana striations anywhere - They would be noticable at least on the bridge (a large and flat section area of the overall frame) in multiple images from all angles. If anything, the olive havana would be even more apparent and visible outside in the sunlight, with the lightest olive striation sections going even lighter with the sunlight shining through the frame, as opposed to the images taken indoors.
Where are the light olive havana striations that would be consistently apparent across the
entire frame surface, especially the bridge, in the HQ images if this was indeed the frame...?
I'm sticking with my gloss black frames.
