Alleged Screen Used Hero TOS Phaser up for auction (now the aftermath)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That’s a crapazoid with a metal rear dial. The malformed emitter is a dead giveaway.

View attachment 1753743
Sorry, what looks to you as malformed I call too zoomed in pixilation. The rest of the body is solid with angles. Crapizoids were soft, like this:
20231022_184528.jpg
 
There IS a phaser stunt moment in the episode, when Kirk knocks the phaser out of Dr. Van Gelder's hand, on the Bridge. And, as I recall, the emitter nozzle can be seen flying off. Perhaps they built a single dummy just for that scene, which also ended up being used by Marianna Hill.

This needs more research.
They did a mix up between Crap(s) and Mid(s) near the end...

BEFORE that scene we see a HERO phaser on the ground. I labeled the caps in order to sort the scenes

crap 0.jpg
dagger-of-the-mind-br-604.jpg
Mid 1.jpg
Mid 1a.jpg

crap 1.jpg
 
Sorry, what looks to you as malformed I call too zoomed in pixilation. The rest of the body is solid with angles. Crapizoids were soft, like this: View attachment 1753744

Ahem….clearly a crapazoid.

IMG_1637.jpeg


You can even see the dome on the bottom of the phaser II handle that is indicative of crapazoids only.

IMG_1636.jpeg


The Phaser II handle is also distinctly short in the palm of the hand, another indication of this being a crapazoid.

And the typical crapazoid silver paint slathered over where the Phaser II window should be is clearly seen.

IMG_1640.jpeg


From the Jein collection desription…note that the rear 10 turn is a machined aluminum piece.

IMG_1638.jpeg
IMG_1639.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Okay, I got home, and was thus able to pop in my Blu-Ray for analysis.

For the record, my original thought, before Chrisisall raised doubt, was that the Helen Noel kiss phaser was indeed a crapazoid. Having now seen the scene in question on my nice, big 4K TV, I’m definitely convinced it is.

As Captain Dunsel noted, it has the bubble on the bottom of the handle, and the emitter nozzle looks softer-detailed and silver-painted, as opposed to the sharply-detailed, shiny aluminum emitter of the Spock hero phaser in the same scene. And, of course, it clearly has very little heft, based on how she holds it.

But it’s a nice crapazoid, so mistaking it for a midgrade at first glance isn’t unreasonable.



And, yes, the crapazoid emitter nozzle DOES break off when Kirk knocks it out of Van Gelder’s hand in the scene on the Bridge.
 
Opinions please, if I take this phaser I just made, and I do some sloppy paint brush strokes on it, then scratch it up a bit, and drop it on pavement a few times, can I make a hundred K selling it at auction? View attachment 1754134

Obviously.

Just be sure to come up with a ridiculous story as "provenance", and LoAs written by non-existent people named after STAR TREK characters and/or episodes, like "Phillip Boyce" and "Robert Shorley" ("Shore Leave").
 
Last edited:
Opinions please, if I take this phaser I just made, and I do some sloppy paint brush strokes on it, then scratch it up a bit, and drop it on pavement a few times, can I make a hundred K selling it at auction?
Honestly and not trying to be harsh in the slightest because you did a very good job for what it is. The overall shape and such is too precise for it to be passed off as a prop built 60 years ago.

IF Star Trek TOS was made 2 or 3 years ago you might have a snow ball's chance in hell lol ;) :lol:
 
Obviously.

Just be sure to come up with a ridiculous story as "provenance", as LoAs written by non-existent people named after STAR TREK characters and/or episodes, like "Phillip Boyce" and "Robert Shorley" ("Shore Leave").
Well he could say he's the son of JPL who worked in the Desilu Prop Shop building phasers from the show and his dad gave it to him and he decided to keep it in a secure place to preserve the iconic sci-fi prop.......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top