defstartrooper
Sr Member
Because I know how cinematography works. Things that are topical can look dimensional, and vice versa. Screen captures from ANH won't prove anything.
On the other hand, if someone were to have an original mold of the helmet (or 1st generation pull) whether or not the scar is part of the actual mold (thus dimensional) would seal the deal. The proof is in the pudding, as they say. If it's in the mold, it's dimensional. If it's not, it's topical. Simple as that.
The Baker mold apparently has no C-scar. Some claim that the UK molds do. But we've yet to see hard evidence of that.
Beyond hard proof, all there is are words and opinions. And often opinions are based solely on blind belief and biased, selective reasoning.
We may never know.
Oh i see one photographic proccess is unreliable but another isn't that's convenient isn't it.
I wouldn't hold much store with the images shared of the SL i'm 99.9% sure SL hasn't ever posted any images anywhere that haven't been touched up to obscure details.
You're quite correct though that there's no solid proof that the UK mould does have a scar of course there's no proof either that it doesn't.
And yes i agree 100% the proof is in the pudding and the accusation comes from GINO that there's no scar on the original helmet and never was lets see him prove it.