You want a good example of how a search engine fails me?
I can't get a WoW model into a papercraft model. The only way to do so seems to be... to downgrade WoW to Burning Crusade so that it's compatible with a 3D Studio Max 2009 plugin that can import .M2 3D model files (the .M2 files being extracted by either an MPQ viewer or WoWModelViewer. and this is of course assuming that the plugin works. I could go to the trouble of downloading an old copy of WoW for nothing.), or to pay for a premium copy of Machinima.
I ran into problems like this when I first had delusions of this craft project years ago. I had to wait for a website that provided the 3D models and textures (from a different game, Sage of Ryzom) because the alternative was to learn how to program something with the open-source engine. HAHAHAHAHA.
This is me "working" on my craft project. (except without the ending)
and you've missed the point entirely.
I disagree. RTFM is TL;DR for "don't ask me, read what exists". (even that's short)
- All the information people need to know exists already, and the purpose of people having to rewrite what is already there is quite pointless. Seriously, all we can write is exactly the same as what has been written elsewhere (google search).
Did you not read my post? Not everything out there is (still) true/accurate. Of course it takes more time for YOU. It takes more time for US to read both the true and untrue, digest it, and figure out which is which. So repeating the true parts is more efficient (for the person learning), unless perhaps there's an argument about how dissemination is a superior learning method. (I think it has limited educational value. It's still inefficient for most things.)
- This forum is mostly a great place to show what progress you've made, and receive advice where to head. If there is nothing to show, and only a one way communication, the system fails.
I'm not really sure what you're getting at. Are you saying that you don't have the time to personally teach me? I could understand that.
Teaching is not a passive activity. (Well, it SHOULDN'T be.) Being attentive to the student's feedback doesn't exactly make it use any less energy.
-If a community around a hobby can't provide comprehensive material for people to start out, either create it, or expect lots of "stupid questions" from people who have no idea what's going on. = = = This thread has recapped the same thing MULTIPLE times (Search feature up top

)
I said "comprehensive". Forum threads are not well organized. They're single, linear threads. At best they awkwardly branch with quoting, but only backwards, not forwards.
I read the first posts very carefully, all of the links, the rest of the 1st page, and I think scanned the second page to see where it was going.
I don't think I'd be very successful searching the thread. What would I search for? How many people are going to specifically use the word "comprehensive", rather than ask questions about their specific projects? It would take quite a while to read all 34 pages.
- Search engines are not good teachers, and I know this from experience. = Thats why reading was made. Of course asking a search engine a question wont answer it, you have to click links, go to the page, and start reading.
I think you missed the argument I made that said it's inefficient for people to just pour over material on the internet that they're completely ignorant about.
but whatever.
I already wasted an entire day with no progress.