mvanwalks421
Well-Known Member
I'm no engineer, but if I correctly understand what you've all been talking about, it seems the unanimous concept would be as follows. Since we don't know if this droid will "brake" using the inside motors or some sort of retractable auxiliary feet, I'm sticking with what we saw in the trailer (an unbroken sphere that rolls with an "R2" head parallel to the plane of the ground). If it turns out this droid does use "retractable auxiliary feet," then the feet will have to retract into the structure of the ball itself, and not inside the ball where the mechanism for movement would be. And if that is the case, some sort of gyro would have to be designed in order for the droid to "decide" which legs to extend and which ones to keep inside. I digress, that is not a concern with this concept.
A: The "R2" styled head, made of a lightweight plastic, fixed on a circular rail on top of section B, and fitted with a motorized rubber wheel so that it can turn it's head on top of the flat surface of section B.
B: A magnet/set of magnets encased in a lightweight plastic structure. This structure would have a flat top fixed with with a circular rail so that section A canattach and turn, a spherical bottom to be "flesh" with section C, and balls/rollers fixed in the spherical bottom so that it can roll across the surface of section C. (The reason section B exists is so that the droid can be able to turn it's head).
C: A ball with a wireless motorized interior, very much like the Sphere 2.0, and a magnet/set of magnets mounted on top of the motor so that it will pull towards the magnet/set of magnets in section B and keep the droid's head on.
Now I'm assuming that the Sphere 2.0's wireless motorized interior stays almost perfectly parallel to the plane of the ground when moving due to the gyro. If it's parallel position is not as absolute as it would theoretically be, then the wireless motorized interior of the droid will need to be heavily weighted between the bottom motorized wheels.
A: The "R2" styled head, made of a lightweight plastic, fixed on a circular rail on top of section B, and fitted with a motorized rubber wheel so that it can turn it's head on top of the flat surface of section B.
B: A magnet/set of magnets encased in a lightweight plastic structure. This structure would have a flat top fixed with with a circular rail so that section A canattach and turn, a spherical bottom to be "flesh" with section C, and balls/rollers fixed in the spherical bottom so that it can roll across the surface of section C. (The reason section B exists is so that the droid can be able to turn it's head).
C: A ball with a wireless motorized interior, very much like the Sphere 2.0, and a magnet/set of magnets mounted on top of the motor so that it will pull towards the magnet/set of magnets in section B and keep the droid's head on.
Now I'm assuming that the Sphere 2.0's wireless motorized interior stays almost perfectly parallel to the plane of the ground when moving due to the gyro. If it's parallel position is not as absolute as it would theoretically be, then the wireless motorized interior of the droid will need to be heavily weighted between the bottom motorized wheels.
Attachments
Last edited: