The heroes journey can be applied to anyone regardless of gender. It sounds like Maureen Murdock wants to co opt life by having to assign gender roles to it. While there may be variations on the adventure (the hero with a thousand faces) and there are blatant differences in the sexes, I don't think in storytelling terms that the basic principles of fiction should be judged by different criteria. That's absurd. Either the story is good or it's bad. It's really that simple.
The heroes journey is a metaphorical expression of the human experience that transcends gender, race, creed, sexual orientation, etc. By defining a character (or person for that matter) solely on one of those elements of an entire personality then you reduce them down to nothing more than a construct and not as a human being. Often it's the very definition of sexist, racist etc.
I'm not suggesting that you think in this way
Joek3rr, not at all, but this is the issue I take with injecting identity politics into entertainment and disguising it as a push for diversity for its own sake and not in service to a story.
Representation is important in media but not when it calls attention to itself because then it becomes virtue signaling and not about addressing the issue at hand, which in this case is telling a good story.