I realize this wasn't your intent, but I think you may have finally explained (for me) why some people are condemning The Force Awakens for being a remake of A New Hope, yet praising Mad Max: Fury Road without acknowledging it's a remake of The Road Warrior. They don't care that Mad Max is the same crap in a different bag, they just wanna' watch stuff git blowed up read good!
Or it's that they acknowledge that the films share a lot of commonality with each other, but also do some different things. Although, in some cases, it really does boil down to "I know it was very similar to the previous films. I don't care. That didn't diminish my sense of having been entertained."
I've been having a discussion with someone about something, and wanted to see what the general consensus here was-
Did you think it was supposed to be clear and obvious from the start that Snoke was a hologram, or did you think he was a giant being, or did you feel it was ambiguous? I don't know if it had some influence whether you kept up with spoilers beforehand or whatever.
I didn't think it was clear he was a hologram until a little later when we saw the hologram flicker, because to me he didn't look anything like an OT hologram, he was opaque, fitting in as part of the scene with the chair on the ground, the same lighting as the scene, and he's even blocking the light rays coming in from the roof, instead of the transparent blue glowy look with scanline effect of the OT, with the floating disembodied jittery look. Even with the context of the Vader/Palpatine parallel I think it was at best intentionally ambiguous whether he was a hologram or a giant.
Someone else argues that it was instantly obvious he was a hologram, because his hologram looked exactly like the holograms in the OT.
What did everyone else think on first viewing?
First time I saw it, it took me about, oh, 5 seconds before the flicker to realize what the hell was going on. I was like "Whoa...what the-- oh. He's a
hologram. I get it now. That makes sense, given that the Emperor used to just do that as a big glowy head."
Re: Mary sue:
In some scenes, yes they did advance Rey too quickly. People mention Luke, but he was already an accomplished pilot. It's mentioned more than once, and even given away flat out that this is the guy, if anyone, who will make the shot.
But through the whole first movie we barely see glimpses that this guy might, one day, be able to control it without hand holding.
But much more than that, it's the tendency in this film to go for extremes with Rey... She isn't given much middle ground. She was a badass, but then she got spooked and ran (a huge pet peeve of mine... movies always do that and it's never believable... I'm looking at you X men... No one ever says "no I don't want super powers, leave me alone"... That's crap... We all know every one would say "sweet, where do learn how to choke people with my mind?"). But then she gets captured... And being confronted by a bad guy makes her not scared anymore... Back to being badass!
But I didn't mind that. For me, Star Wars is a fairy tale. The running away annoyed me yes, but her being badass was kinda cool. I really don't need that part to be more believable, although I would like less up and down. I say just let her be a badass. No more emo "but I don't want super powers" Bs.
So for me... Honestly I'd actuality almost rather MORE Mary sue, less extreme up and down.
The one moment of hers that's still hard for me is the fight. The pause is too long and it makes it seem like she was losing, until Kylo reminds her that the force is a thing, then shes like "oh yeah! I can totally swing this weapon I'm holding back and forth! Why didn't I try that sooner?"
Should've been a shorter pause... Just let her get pissed and fight harder. Same outcome, but would've been smoother. Besides, there's precedent for that in earlier films.
Also someone again mentioned Leia ignoring Chewie to hug girl she never met before... Yeah... That was a crap moment. It was like "is Leia watching this movie with us? How does she even know that Rey is the lead?"
So, two things.
First, I think the "I'm running away from my powers" thing kinda makes sense if their introduction has suddenly made the world a much more confusing and dangerous place for the character. Like, you wake up one morning and realize that, not only can you shoot destructive beams of plasma from your palms, but that you can also sort of fly (although you're still figuring out how). On top of that, soon after, the government/an evil organization/other superpowered individuals want to come take you away from your life and train you/use you for their own ends/kill you. You might say "Screw this! I just want to go back to my normal life!"
I don't know about you, but I actually think Jessica Jones did a
really good job with this and people not wanting to have their superpowers exposed to the world, for fear of both the responsibility that'd lay on them, the danger it'd put them and everyone they know into, and the loss of any sense of normalcy. Me, I
like my normal life. I don't really want superpowers.
Second, on the subject of the "Mary Sue"/"competent character." I think the ultimate problem with this trope is that the character's powers are (1) apparently limitless, (2) appear entirely as needed for the situation, and (3)
not effectively earned or explained.
The absolute worst examples of this are, like, 1950s Superman or Batman comics, where either of them has just the superpower/gadget-in-utility-belt or specialized knowledge to escape their dilemma, and yet they've never evinced any such ability in the past. Giant monster that shoots electricity and whose entire body is surrounded by a shield of lightning? No problem! Superman will just use his super-breath to create a field of insulation around his body! (Or whatever.) And boy, isn't it handy that Batman had his Polarity-reversing batarang in his utility belt today? "Golly, that sure was close!" "You got that right, old chum!" The Joker and Lex Luthor have used a mind-ray to brainwash Lois Lane and Robin into being axe-wielding lunatics? No problem! Batman's study of the ancient Nepalese art of Kong-Bava -- a mind-calming technique handed down by Siddharthic Monks for generations -- can save the day. Or Superman can just use his super-frequency-voice to reverse the mind-ray's waves! Phew! Another catastrophe averted! :rolleyes
Interpreted another way, the big objection is that the author is just pulling the solution out of their ass. In another sense, it turns the character almost into a walking
deus ex machina. The problem with all of these tropes is that they completely destroy the dramatic stakes in the story. Nobody is ever in any real danger, because we know the character has unlimited, unearned power and the author will simply pull one out of his or her ass to solve whatever problem faces the character.
I don't see that being the case with Rey, though. I think the writers were making an attempt to indicate that she does indeed have great, untapped power. However, they also tried to lampshade that the
source of that power is unknown, as are the
limits of that power. It's a huge question mark and one that, I think, is intended to drive the drama for her character in the next film and likely beyond. I expect that the explanation for the source of Rey's power will also enlighten us as to just how far it goes, and whether there are any catches to that power or its ongoing use.
At any rate, I recognize that the pace of the film is such that the "Holy crap! How did I do that?!" reactions are almost "blink and you'll miss it." But I do think there was at least an attempt to make her not just be a "competent character" who's a master of everything as the situation requires.