kristen jones
Master Member
I've been having a discussion with someone about something, and wanted to see what the general consensus here was-
Did you think it was supposed to be clear and obvious from the start that Snoke was a hologram, or did you think he was a giant being, or did you feel it was ambiguous? I don't know if it had some influence whether you kept up with spoilers beforehand or whatever.
I didn't think it was clear he was a hologram until a little later when we saw the hologram flicker, because to me he didn't look anything like an OT hologram, he was opaque, fitting in as part of the scene with the chair on the ground, the same lighting as the scene, and he's even blocking the light rays coming in from the roof, instead of the transparent blue glowy look with scanline effect of the OT, with the floating disembodied jittery look. Even with the context of the Vader/Palpatine parallel I think it was at best intentionally ambiguous whether he was a hologram or a giant.
Someone else argues that it was instantly obvious he was a hologram, because his hologram looked exactly like the holograms in the OT.
What did everyone else think on first viewing?
It was impossible for me to be objective going into it, because I had read certain spoliers which stated that the actors were reacting to Andy Serkis on a 25 foot platform. So when I went to see TFA--and Snoke came on--I thought "He really IS 25 feet tall! How can that be...? Oh.... he's a hologram"
So yes, I *did* realize it... but it took a moment or two for my brain to register.
- - - Updated - - -
Right now I am beginning to doubt he even saw the film, if he thinks Poe was a more important character than Finn.
I wouldn't say "more" important. I definitely liked Poe... and I love that we have a crack pilot to cheer for. He also seems like a very likeable character. But I wouldn't give him more import than Finn. I'd say--for myself-- they are about tied.