Gotta go with Solo... I will never understand why Lucas views the situation the way he does. Lucas certainly doesn't mind pimping anything else out to make money but heaven forbid he just give fans a cleaned up version of the original Star Wars.
But, such is life and it sucks sometimes.
Lucas is definitely mistaken in the notion that the SE will eventually be remembered as the "only" version. No chance in heck of that happening and even by saying it, he's making sure it'll never happen. It's like a self-un-fulfilling prophecy.
I've heard it said that the original version is co-owned by Fox, but the Special Edition is all his, so that affects who he has to share royalties with. I don't know if that's true.
Actually, the way I hear it, it's not Fox.. it's the ex-wife. She's entitled to royalties from the sale of the unaltered trilogy. The versions released on the last DVD set were considered "bonus features" and not a separate release.I've heard it said that the original version is co-owned by Fox, but the Special Edition is all his, so that affects who he has to share royalties with. I don't know if that's true.
That was actually part of one of the original mixes from '77. The SE mix used aspects of all three original mixes.When Bern Burtt replaced the Stormtrooper Blaster sounds with .44 Magnum shots in the "chasm swing" scene (in one of the earlier SE versions) my jawed dropped. WTF?????????????
I've heard it said that the original version is co-owned by Fox, but the Special Edition is all his, so that affects who he has to share royalties with. I don't know if that's true.
No, no, that's all mixed up.
The original video MASTERS that were used to make the 1993 laserdiscs were what were used for the "bonus disc" original versions on DVD. This has nothing to do with what film elements were used for the 1997 Special Edition.
But Lucas and Fox have 35mm material galore.
When they pulled the original 35mm camera negative from the vault, much of it had "gone pink" due to the use of a new Eastman stock that turned out to have stabilization issues.
YCM labs physically cleaned the negative with various techniques, from baths to meticulously removing embedded dirt with a razor blade. Then they used various photochemical techniques to make dupes of the pink sections and restored the proper colors. For some shots, they had to dupe vintage prints, such as an archival Technicolor print privately owned by Lucas.
So at that stage, the original, restored version existed in film form.
(the following might not be in precise chronological order)
Then they decided to redo all of the optical transitions (wipes and dissolves).
Then George decided to do some more fixes. And then a few more. And then some more. All of these were done digitally, using scans of the original footage.
The digital artists worked at 1080p resolution. Yes. Not 2K or 4K like everyone else does. Their work was output to film, and those negatives were cut back into the original negative, replacing the original versions of those shots.
So when George says the original version doesn't exist anymore, that's what he means.
But could it be put back together? Yes, absolutely! The replaced sections would have been retained. All they'd need to do is scan the altered version to 4K or something, then scan all the saved trims of the original sections, and put them back together digitally, making any non-invasive corrections at the same time (dirt removal, color correction, etc). You know, like Warner Bros has done with Gone With the Wind, or what Coppola did with Godfather.
It would not cost all that much. He just doesn't want to.
Don't think that is true. I seem to remember reading there was a clause in his contract with Fox that said if the studio was sold all rights reverted to LFL. When Murdoch bought the studio that's when it happened. Lucas owns it outright and can do anything he wants. The only thing they share is possibly distribution rights.
Even on my old VHS tapes it's that sound - it's always been that sound - different than anywhere else in the movie. Nothing new.When Bern Burtt replaced the Stormtrooper Blaster sounds with .44 Magnum shots in the "chasm swing" scene (in one of the earlier SE versions) my jawed dropped. WTF?????????????
We never got the terrorist line in any of the Danish releases of this movie. I always recall it as pirate. There were different mixes and different lines.The BTTF "terrorist" line removal is censorship that is the first step to 1984.
LOL... can't stand the exes touch on the film, eh, since he has to remove her edits and keep her from earning her rightful cut.Actually, the way I hear it, it's not Fox.. it's the ex-wife. She's entitled to royalties from the sale of the unaltered trilogy. The versions released on the last DVD set were considered "bonus features" and not a separate release.
Where did you read this? A lot of those details aren't in the American Cinematographer issue. It doesn't mention cuting new material into the old negative.
It was in the original mono mix, which was the last English-language mix done before they did the other languages, so it makes sense it would've been the sounds Denmark and the rest of the world heard.Even on my old VHS tapes it's that sound - it's always been that sound - different than anywhere else in the movie. Nothing new.
Where did you read this? A lot of those details aren't in the American Cinematographer issue. It doesn't mention cuting new material into the old negative.
mmh prints are soo rare..
STAR WARS 35mm Feature Film ORIGINAL complete 6 Reels
![]()
This film has been in a private collection since 1980 and not publicly shown.
The sale of this film is intended for home use only...
No, no, that's all mixed up.
The original video MASTERS that were used to make the 1993 laserdiscs were what were used for the "bonus disc" original versions on DVD. This has nothing to do with what film elements were used for the 1997 Special Edition.
But Lucas and Fox have 35mm material galore.
When they pulled the original 35mm camera negative from the vault, much of it had "gone pink" due to the use of a new Eastman stock that turned out to have stabilization issues.
YCM labs physically cleaned the negative with various techniques, from baths to meticulously removing embedded dirt with a razor blade. Then they used various photochemical techniques to make dupes of the pink sections and restored the proper colors. For some shots, they had to dupe vintage prints, such as an archival Technicolor print privately owned by Lucas.
So at that stage, the original, restored version existed in film form.
(the following might not be in precise chronological order)
Then they decided to redo all of the optical transitions (wipes and dissolves).
Then George decided to do some more fixes. And then a few more. And then some more. All of these were done digitally, using scans of the original footage.
The digital artists worked at 1080p resolution. Yes. Not 2K or 4K like everyone else does. Their work was output to film, and those negatives were cut back into the original negative, replacing the original versions of those shots.
So when George says the original version doesn't exist anymore, that's what he means.
But could it be put back together? Yes, absolutely! The replaced sections would have been retained. All they'd need to do is scan the altered version to 4K or something, then scan all the saved trims of the original sections, and put them back together digitally, making any non-invasive corrections at the same time (dirt removal, color correction, etc). You know, like Warner Bros has done with Gone With the Wind, or what Coppola did with Godfather.
It would not cost all that much. He just doesn't want to.
I thought the entire reason for the National Film Registry was to preserve original copies of movies