HMSwolfe
Master Member
Man I love the AuralnautsWith Hayden back and discussion on voice... feel this brilliant piece needs a repost
Man I love the AuralnautsWith Hayden back and discussion on voice... feel this brilliant piece needs a repost
Someone she met when she was only 10 years old. If this was the only time they met prior to ANH then I don't think that it really contradicts anything. While both the meeting and the circumstances of the meeting were certainly memorable, if she has no other contact with Ben after she eventually is returned to her father, I'd call that getting to know Ben particularly well.This dialog does indeed show that she's aware that "Ben Kenobi" is "Obi-Wan Kenobi." But I'm not sure how it shows that she knew him prior to her sending him the message via R2. That message still, to me, sounds as if she's appealing to someone she understood to be a past ally of her father, and not someone she met personally before.
Same actor who plays Han in the Fast/Furious movies. It's Star Wars, a fair bit of the acting will always be dialed to 11.That fifth brother though, you want to point a finger at bad acting, that guy is hammier than Porky Pig!!
I know, but one actress is getting hauled over the coals for it. That guy isn't and he is way, way worse.Same actor who plays Han in the Fast/Furious movies. It's Star Wars, a fair bit of the acting will always be dialed to 11.
No, yeah, he’s awful, awful, awful. Chewing every word of his and spitting it out through gritted teeth. Again, they (the Inquisitors) may be doing exactly what the script describes or what the director is telling them to do, it may be ALL the writing and not the actors at all. But I doubt that it’s entirely out of their hands to make these roles any better. For instance, Darth Maul has been voiced by two actors in live-action. One was a real actor, Peter Serafinowicz, and the other was…well, was Sam Witwer. One came across as the role was written (stoic, cold) and the other is amateurish, melodramatic, and ham-fisted.I know, but one actress is getting hauled over the coals for it. That guy isn't and he is way, way worse.
Gotcha. Neither have bothered me either way so... ::Shrug::I know, but one actress is getting hauled over the coals for it. That guy isn't and he is way, way worse.
James Earl Jones, Carrie Fisher, Frank Oz all did great jobs IMO. Why is the argument that something that was sub par in the OT a justification for continuing it? Makes no sense.When has star wars as a whole ever had good acting? kenobi/emperor/han were really the only characters that had good acting. Everyone else across all era's have been pretty average as actors. Remove your childhood feelings and emotions and you know it to be true....
I will say, i liked Giancarlo Esposito in Mandalorian...i thought him to be very good. Peter Cushing? Really good as well. Salute to the Moff's...lolWhen has star wars as a whole ever had good acting? kenobi/emperor/han were really the only characters that had good acting. Everyone else across all era's have been pretty average as actors. Remove your childhood feelings and emotions and you know it to be true....
continuity? they have to feel like one long movieJames Earl Jones, Carrie Fisher, Frank Oz all did great jobs IMO. Why is the argument that something that was sub par in the OT a justification for continuing it? Makes no sense.
Hit the nail on the head...Honestly, i don't like any of the Smashing Pumpkins, i mean the Inquisitors. They are about as fearsome as the coneheads on SNL. It's the charcters themselves. I'm sure the actors and actresses feel a little handcuffed with how they were written.No, yeah, he’s awful, awful, awful. Chewing every word of his and spitting it out through gritted teeth. Again, they (the Inquisitors) may be doing exactly what the script describes or what the director is telling them to do, it may be ALL the writing and not the actors at all. But I doubt that it’s entirely out of their hands to make these roles any better. For instance, Darth Maul has been voiced by two actors in live-action. One was a real actor, Peter Serafinowicz, and the other was…well, was Sam Witwer. One came across as the role was written (stoic, cold) and the other is amateurish, melodramatic, and ham-fisted.
It’s unfair and definitely reeks of trolls and racists that she’s getting so much personal flak over this role, but we shouldn’t shut up about honest and fair criticism because of it. If anything, we should be more clear and objective about our critiques, because if we allow the narrative to be driven by trolls, then all we get is “only racists/misogynists/bigots hate this show because they’re prejudiced, it’s actually great and you shouldn’t question that.” It was terrible that Jake Lloyd or Ahmed Best got such poor treatment over their roles, but that doesn’t make little Anakin or Jar Jar any better or more watchable. Heck, even George got terrible, terrible, undeserved flak for the prequels. Vicious, personal attacks on his character and sanity. But they’re still bad movies. They still should be viewed critically.
When has star wars as a whole ever had good acting? kenobi/emperor/han were really the only characters that had good acting. Everyone else across all era's have been pretty average as actors. Remove your childhood feelings and emotions and you know it to be true....
I'm all for continuity but I don't see having good acting as affecting it negatively in the slightest. In fact that would raise the bar potentially making future content better. Everything doesn't need to be exactly the same for it be SW but I understand that we all have different ideas of what makes SW SW.continuity? they have to feel like one long movie