Not sure it's something kids should be allowed to watch. Especially so if Tarantino starts making it.
Star Trek: Picard
- Thread starter renaissance_man
- Start date
Not sure it's something kids should be allowed to watch. Especially so if Tarantino starts making it.
I take it that they did not return to the Callaway Vineyard in Temecula, which was used as the Picard Vineyard in TNG’s “Family” and “All Good Things...”?
Temecula Wineries | Callaway Vineyard & Winery in Temecula Wine Country
Last edited:
Hell any of the new Trek access show are not even shot on the Paramount lot!
There was a time when all sound stages on the lot were being used for various Trek Productions
There was a time when all sound stages on the lot were being used for various Trek Productions
They could at least use the Aliso Viejo "ziggurat". That looks more Star Trek than a lot of the recent buildings they've used for exteriors...
It appears that part of the story takes place on the planet where Kirk fought the Gorn, or the planet where they found Lazarus, or the Shore Leave planet, or Capella IV, or the planet from “Who Watches the Watchers”, or the planet Vulcan....
I’m not sure, they all look so familiar to me.
I’m not sure, they all look so familiar to me.
edit: I know they filmed a bunch there. Found images of all the ones you said. I just posted this one because it's near the same spot and obviously the same rock.
Attachments
Last edited:
Just a shot in the dark, but I wonder if he returns to Mintaka III to visit the Proto-Vulcans during the new series?
I really wish this show would go in a more Trek direction with a scientific story or exploratory theme... instead of more kicky shooty boom boom that old Trek didnt have to rely on so much. However the trailer doesnt seem to indicate this direction.
This looks more like Picard jumped into ST Discovery.
This looks more like Picard jumped into ST Discovery.
Last edited:
peterquill
Sr Member
with picard, & data coming back, it instantly reminded me of this,
Enjoy,
Enjoy,
Last edited:
When I watched season 1 of STD I didn't really hate so much as I didn't think of it as Star Trek and I still don't. Some of their ideas and concepts are so far away from Star Trek that it boggles the mind. The other thing that I didn't like about it was that the producers tried very hard to make a space version of Game of Throans, which they mentioned they all loved, and with the exception of the incest they did pretty much that though I expected to be told that at some point Spock and Michael had gotten it on together while growing up.
The Brahma Bull
Sr Member
A scientific way is ok, but not in a 80's to 90's ST series way. TNG is the most overrated series ever. This show was carried by Stewart alone and his legendary facepalm is a symbol of 80% of the scripts that made an episode. There was so much really crappy stuff in TNG, DS9 and Voyager that some average episodes look great in comparison.
I disagree.
Not as consistently crappy as Star Trek post-2009.
Also, in general, comparing things by their 'look' is unscientific and leads to poor conclusions.
Last edited:
The Brahma Bull
Sr Member
Nothing can ever be more crappy as the first two seasons of TNG. Voyager maybe, but only because they ****** up a interesting concept from the start right away.
Don't let "Shades of Grey" cloud your memory, there were a number of great episodes in those first two seasons, solid stories that stand to this day.
Also, Voyager had many solid episodes across its 7 Seasons.
