Star Trek Beyond
- Thread starter Bryancd
- Start date
Re: New STAR TREK 3
Still need to catch up to the later sequels, but from what I have heard the FF movies kept getting better as the franchise continued.
Though little balance of action is good, more trek with emphasis on exploration without rehashing previous storylines would be welcoming for this Star Trek sequel.
Still need to catch up to the later sequels, but from what I have heard the FF movies kept getting better as the franchise continued.
Though little balance of action is good, more trek with emphasis on exploration without rehashing previous storylines would be welcoming for this Star Trek sequel.
Zombie_61
Master Member
Re: New STAR TREK 3
I couldn't agree more. Star Trek Into Darkness ended with the Enterprise and her crew setting off on their five-year mission, so let's get on with it and let them explore something other than familiar territory and re-hashed characters and plotlines.
cayman shen
Master Member
Re: New STAR TREK 3
Yep, Star Trek is dead.
Yep, Star Trek is dead.
Re: New STAR TREK 3
At least JJ Abrams made Justin's job a little bit easier when he told his design team what he wanted the Enterprise to look like in the 2009 movie.
At least JJ Abrams made Justin's job a little bit easier when he told his design team what he wanted the Enterprise to look like in the 2009 movie.
Industrial Light and Magic: JJ wanted us to turn the Enterprise into a Hot Rod. And that's what we're most proud of is turning the Enterprise into this Hot Rod thing.
kegas76
Well-Known Member
Re: New STAR TREK 3
"thing " is the right word.
No grace, a characature, and certainly not a "she" spoken of in reverence by her Captain.
A command that is stolen with lies and cheats and not earned.
Ill stop myself before I use extremely foul words and heap hell upon a certain so called director who "never liked Star Trek." and "couldn't get into it.".
"thing " is the right word.
No grace, a characature, and certainly not a "she" spoken of in reverence by her Captain.
A command that is stolen with lies and cheats and not earned.
Ill stop myself before I use extremely foul words and heap hell upon a certain so called director who "never liked Star Trek." and "couldn't get into it.".
ghostryder
Legendary Member
Re: New STAR TREK 3
I look forward to being let down by this.
I look forward to being let down by this.
Father
Sr Member
Re: New STAR TREK 3
That's a loong ways off... I predict this changing hands at least one more time before it becomes a reality and possibly bumping up the time line/release date.
That's a loong ways off... I predict this changing hands at least one more time before it becomes a reality and possibly bumping up the time line/release date.
Re: New STAR TREK 3
That's because JJ Abrahams discovered the force and can never go back!
That's because JJ Abrahams discovered the force and can never go back!
Re: New STAR TREK 3
I think they will stick with 2016 to coincide with the 50th Anniversary and they will want to keep it in the summer slot.
So it's just 1 and 1/2 year left for pre-production, filming and post-production.
I think they will stick with 2016 to coincide with the 50th Anniversary and they will want to keep it in the summer slot.
So it's just 1 and 1/2 year left for pre-production, filming and post-production.
Re: New STAR TREK 3
Wow... I just noticed having a release date fills me with mild dread rather than anticipation. The more I see about how this current version of the franchise (hate thinking of it in that term, too), the more I lament the fact that we'll likely never see what my headcanon wants -- three or four films building up to the never-before-seen first year of Kirk's command of Enterprise, Billy Piper as Elizabeth Dehner and Benedict Cumberbatch as Gary Mitchell, and maybe find someone with better eyes to play Kirk. Then, after we've had a whole film for them to get used to each other and learn how to work together, we do a revamped "WNMHGB" where Kirk has to kill his best friend after he develops scenery-chewing godlike powers (and maybe even work Q into it, as the books have).
We have a chance to retell some of the best stories from TOS with better production values and more time to devote to them, and also to the stories we've wanted to seen told but never have, and it's being blown on, of all things, an alternate universe of bad science, bad storytelling, unmotivated characters, and general flash-over-substance film-making as has become too commonplace these days.
--Jonah
Wow... I just noticed having a release date fills me with mild dread rather than anticipation. The more I see about how this current version of the franchise (hate thinking of it in that term, too), the more I lament the fact that we'll likely never see what my headcanon wants -- three or four films building up to the never-before-seen first year of Kirk's command of Enterprise, Billy Piper as Elizabeth Dehner and Benedict Cumberbatch as Gary Mitchell, and maybe find someone with better eyes to play Kirk. Then, after we've had a whole film for them to get used to each other and learn how to work together, we do a revamped "WNMHGB" where Kirk has to kill his best friend after he develops scenery-chewing godlike powers (and maybe even work Q into it, as the books have).
We have a chance to retell some of the best stories from TOS with better production values and more time to devote to them, and also to the stories we've wanted to seen told but never have, and it's being blown on, of all things, an alternate universe of bad science, bad storytelling, unmotivated characters, and general flash-over-substance film-making as has become too commonplace these days.
--Jonah
Similar threads
