Mara Jade's Father
Master Member
I am going to give this a try. I switched to concentric on the pips a couple weeks ago to get better results, never thought of doing it on the backing.Because you're not seeing the infill, you're seeing the top/bottom layers, which appear to be set to rectilinear. The outer walls (which include the walls around the holes) are concentric. The nozzle is moving in a different pattern and on a part this thin, that difference is obvious.
If the top/bottom layers were set to concentric, the difference would be much less apparent. Probably not invisible, but less noticable.
Mara Jade's Father besides changing the top/bottom pattern, you might try boosting the flow rate on the ironing, or reducing the spacing. As with all experiments, only change one parameter at a time. I'd also suggest making both the backers and the layer heights some multiple of 0.04. Whilst modern printers don't care as much as those from a few years ago, the stepper motors are still happiest in zed increments that are multiples of 0.04. So 0.08 or 0.12 is likely to give slightly more consistent results.
Darthmagpie : don't forget that paint occupies volume. Since the lines here are so, so, so close - the silk looks really good, honestly - I suspect the reason they're disappearing on the painted one is because the paint is filling in the lines. Also, it sounds like MJF is sanding before painting.
I played with finer ironing setting in the past but sometimes it made it look streaky so I thought I might be overdoing it.
I totally forgot about the multiple of .04mm thing. I have been using some of the presets on this new printer a the current best is 0.1mm but sometimes I do .04mm. But now I will switch out 0.1 for 0.08 or 0.12 in the future.
And yes, I have been sanding prior ro painting. for the most part, it is mostly fine grit or wet sanding. It has been easier to sand than to fill in most cases because it almost like scratches.