What an interesting (and sad) read. This does bring up some VERY interesting questions for me... not specific to this fight, as I am not a Vader person, but to the nature of research in this hobby in general.
A number of people are claiming Gino is being disrespectful to Brian but my question to you who feel that way is this: because someone was involved with the prodcution of a movie or specific prop, does that place them in a position above question? Should members not be allowed to question or disagree when they feel a "fact" has been misrepresented?
I ask this because in my experience with talking to a number of people involved in production, they often have nuggets of truth mixed in with a lot of supposition and even more out-and-out inaccuracies. Now, I don't think ANYONE that I have talked to has purposefully made a false statement, but there have been plenty of times where the facts simply don't back up their claims. Again, let me reitterate, I am not saying this is the case here... I don't know.. I have NO knolwdge of Vader... but it DOES concern me to see what appers to be a precident being set in which a person related to the production is beyond question and their word is readily accpeted as fact and anyone who would DARE to question those "facts" is dogpiled for their "audacity."
And don't think I don't know that Gino can be arroagnt or a pain, but it would seem that what is happening here is a censorship of the ability to critically think for oneself and a mob mentality of forceably demanding anything that is said by someone involved with the production be accepted by the community as unquestionable fact.
My real concern is why Brian's statements (or anyone involved in a production) aren't open to review and constructive criticism. Sure, his statements should hold more weight because of his involvement with Vader, but he, like the rest of us is human, and as prone to error or misremembering as anyone else. It baffles me that it would appear the argument is that we should just put our brain on a shelf and be spoonfed information as long as someone was tied to the production. Seems like a very dangerous path to me...