whats going on with this section?
https://i.imgur.com/CnX1QTs.jpg
is it just the way the clamp is sitting?
View attachment 785547
Here's a shot of the old design compared with the new model
Great news Dan !!!
I've got few remarks especially like Halliwax said. (Maybe you already know it like you said in a previous post)
But, in my picture the colors area (Especially the red and yellow) seems to be taller compare to brandon's V2.
The blue one is maybe a "shadow-game", because of the different angle of the picture.
View attachment 785565
Great news Dan !!!
I've got few remarks especially like Halliwax said. (Maybe you already know it like you said in a previous post)
But, in my picture the colors area (Especially the red and yellow) seems to be taller compare to brandon's V2.
The blue one is maybe a "shadow-game", because of the different angle of the picture.
View attachment 785565
Good eyes. I agree the yellow area may be a bit large. I'm not sure sure about the red area though. It looks ok at first glance. It's difficult to tell about the blue area as we're looking at the booster at a slight downward angle.
Dan, beautiful work already!
Agreed, the red and yellow marked areas seem off to me too. Your computer model seems to show much different angles. But excited by the progress!
I agree as well. it looks spectacular and the emitter/ pommel especially.
the shoulder above the clamp seems to have a longer length than the V2 itself. angle might be right, but on the V2 they're tiny transitions and on the sample all three sections are too long. (last part of the grenade, bevel and then part above clamp. was this what you'd mentioned the shop had to correct?
Here’s an idea why not retake the image in the same way that everyone here seems to be comparing it to in the other image?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's true that the angle make a slightly difference and make it harder to compare.
If we compare this section : (Red = Dan, Yellow = Brandon)
View attachment 785639
View attachment 785640
But we are maybe debating about the corrections that Dan already asked to the shop
Easier said than done
Easier said than done
- - - Updated - - -
I've made these changes to my model now, so we should be all set here. I also moved the transcriptor knob hole and the pommel set screw hole up a little bit towards the emitter on the booster, since they looked a little low in these comparisons. Anything else?
Great Dan [emoji3]Easier said than done
- - - Updated - - -
I've made these changes to my model now, so we should be all set here. I also moved the transcriptor knob hole and the pommel set screw hole up a little bit towards the emitter on the booster, since they looked a little low in these comparisons. Anything else?