New Doctor Who Series Discussion *Spoilers*

Fantastic episode, I dident think it could get better than the last episode with the clifhangers and all, a really great two parter and oen fo the best finales i've seen!
 
One thing: plastic Rory wasn't Rory, but a construct created from Amy's memories. So why, when the Doctor showed up at the wedding, did Rory start telling those around him in the background about being plastic?

Because Amy 'remembered' him back into his real self, but kept the memories as well of the Auton version.

LOVED hearing a Dalek beg for mercy.

I liked that Moffat really DID think that scene in the Angels episode through and had the Doctor wearing his coat which was a clue to something hinky going on.

Wondering if River Song really WILL end up being the Rani or something like that after that last bit about everything changing.

Overall, I didn't like this season. With the rare exceptions, it really wasn't that good. However, this two part finale really made it worth it.
 
Probably the best season of Who so far. The biggest improvement for me was how well the overall arc was weaved into the story, rather than RTD's heavy-handed hints. Moffat nailed it out right out of the gate and now I can't wait for Christmas!

Geronimo!
 
A great finale to a reasonable first season.
It always takes a while for a new Doctor to find his feet and for the writers to get a feel for his style.

Matt Smith was very good in the role and i'm sure the next season will be much better.

One thing: plastic Rory wasn't Rory, but a construct created from Amy's memories. So why, when the Doctor showed up at the wedding, did Rory start telling those around him in the background about being plastic?

Is he still an Auton though?

I don't know either way but if Amy's parents were restored from the crack why wouldn't human Rory be too?
 
Last edited:
Rory's human again. From there point of view, they had never met the Doctor in that timeline, once the Doctor had closed the cracks. There memories come from the previous universe that the Pandorica reconstructed.
 
I'm not really getting a lot of went on in that episode. Too much timey-wimey stuff.

How did River remember The Doctor, to be at the wedding and give Rory the book to make Amy remember, and how come River still had the vortex manipulator from the previous timeline?

And the big one, how did Amy remembering a person from a timeline that never happened resurrect the Doctor from 'the other side' or whatever?

The whole thing gave me a headache, tbh.
 
I'm not really getting a lot of went on in that episode. Too much timey-wimey stuff.

How did River remember The Doctor, to be at the wedding and give Rory the book to make Amy remember, and how come River still had the vortex manipulator from the previous timeline?

And the big one, how did Amy remembering a person from a timeline that never happened resurrect the Doctor from 'the other side' or whatever?

The whole thing gave me a headache, tbh.

It's been established in previous episodes that once you are a time traveler you don't easily succumb to timeline changes and reboots and can recall these events even if they "never happened".

River might have gotten another manipulator and gone back to find the doctor, knowing he would be there from later encounters.

There are a few loose threads here and there. I'd have to watch it again and take notes.

I get the feeling the doctor needed a whole series to get his stride this time. He was bumbling about in the first few episodes, but in the last ones he started to get up to speed.

Roll on the X-mas episode !!!
 
Just before he flew the Pandorica, the Doctor told Amy that becuase she had lived her life with that crack in her room, the universe had poured into her head. As his time stream was then re-winding, he told her the story of himself and the blue box. Upon seeing Rivers diary, Amy remember the Doctor and 'Something old, something new, something borrowed and something blue.'

As for River, the TARDIS had taken her to the day of Amy's wedding prior to the explosion, therefore, when the universe was reconstructed, that was the right place for her to be. The Doctor still had the VM, which he then gave to River, presumably so that she could go back to her own time.
 
Hmmm...River stated herself that she wouldn't remember The Doctor if the timeline was rebooted...and she went and cut off another Time Agent's hand??

I think I need to watch the whole season again, but right now I'm not really feeling the love. Big Bang suffered the same problems for me as a lot of Moffat's episodes - not really thought out that well and kinda holey, like The Beast Below and Time of Angels. I think he has really cool ideas, but they aren't very well plotted.

Say what you will about RTD, behind the crappy humour and fart gags, his stuff was extremeley well plotted and tightly paced. This season has been all over the place, just not really clicking for me.

Still the best thing on TV though :lol
 
Just before he flew the Pandorica, the Doctor told Amy that becuase she had lived her life with that crack in her room, the universe had poured into her head. As his time stream was then re-winding, he told her the story of himself and the blue box. Upon seeing Rivers diary, Amy remember the Doctor and 'Something old, something new, something borrowed and something blue

Yeah I get all that, but that resurrected him how, now?

As for River, the TARDIS had taken her to the day of Amy's wedding prior to the explosion, therefore, when the universe was reconstructed, that was the right place for her to be. The Doctor still had the VM, which he then gave to River, presumably so that she could go back to her own time.

That doesn't work. The new timeline didn't exist at that point - the book wouldn't have been blank, and River would have known the resolution to the whole story when the Doctor rescued her from the exploding Tardis. I guess he could have given her the VM though - or did they actually show that? I'm confuuuused!

Edit:

My bad, he did give it to her, just checked.
 
Last edited:
It's science fiction, anything is possible.

Time travel is so complex that sometimes it just isn't worth thinking about too deeply. Take it as what it is, a story.

It doesn't matter if the new time line didn't exist. When the TARDIS exploded, the last place that River had been was at Amy's house. She couldn't have been put back in the TARDIS because until Amy brought him back, there was no Doctor/TARDIS.
 
Time travel is so complex that sometimes it just isn't worth thinking about too deeply

Yeah, I guess that's the problem I had with it. There's about 10 pages of folk trying to make sense of it over at IMDB. I just don't think you should need a degree in astrophysics to make sense out of a Doctor Who season finale.
 
In the words of River Song: Spoilers

A major part of the continuing story arc has already been recently revealed in this very thread ;)

You need to have a good knowledge of the Doctors past to recognize what is happening but it's not necessary to follow and enjoy the new story arc. Moffat has a plan.
 
Did they ever explain why Amy did not know who the Daleks were when the Doctor met here. I do not remember that being covered.

River Song made a point of saying very soon "Everything Will Change" at the end of the episode. That is a clue.

I have got it!!!!! She gets hooked on earth kid crack which turns her into the the three headed vomiting beast from TorchWood Childrean of earth (same as a Jack Harkness evolves in the face of Boe sort of thing). She then kills Ianto Jones The "very good man" and goes to prison for murder and using human children for drugs thus tying the whole BBC universe together.

I am on to something here. :lol:lol
 
I'm a sucker for Glasses shaking and rattling when something big is coming, that raised the hairs on the back of my neck. Christmas and next season are going to be a blast.
 
I just played the first episode of the Doctor Who Adventure game today. Not a great video game, but it was fun, and it basically makes the season 4 episodes longer, even if the episodes aren't part of the arc.
 
If that's driving you nuts then why did Amy not remember her parents but in the first episode of season 5, Amelia refers to her mum cutting faces on apples so she would like them.

Okay, so exactly how did River get to Amy's wedding?

This is driving me nuts now.
 
If that's driving you nuts then why did Amy not remember her parents but in the first episode of season 5, Amelia refers to her mum cutting faces on apples so she would like them.

I assumed that she was just reacting to seeing them for the first time in their middle age.
You know, like maybe as a child she knew how they looked then (in their twenties/thirties) but she'd never (from her perspective) seen them in their forties/fifties.
Thats just my theory though so who knows.
 
Back
Top