DuneMuadDib
Sr Member
Curious to see this article. The problem with that argument is that official and non-official sources have treated the 12 regeneration limit as truth for 40ish years, whereas The Doctor's age fluctuated a bit before the relaunch, was lowered in the relaunch, and Moffat made up a "don't worry about it" explanation to cover RTD's inconsistency. Just because the Doctor lied about his age (or the writers screwed up) and Moffat's introduced this concept of the Doctor lying doesn't mean that the regeneration limit is a lie.I know that Moffat has never been a fan of the regeneration limit. I remember reading an article where he was arguing about the validity of the Doctor's truthfulness, since it was the 3rd Doctor that said there were only 12 regenerations. Moffat's point was that the 3rd Doctor also stated that he was over 3,000 years old, so, why do we take one statement as complete truth & then treat the other as a throwaway line.
RTD wrote that episode of SJA, so I don't know how much credit can be given to Moffat for that line as Moffat had nothing to do with the show. The only reason to to take the Doctor at his word is that Moffat's spent his tenure beating viewers over the head with "the Doctor lies." Too much of that and viewers won't trust the Doctor, and by extension those who write his words. I think making a lie of the regeneration limit, which to me is a significant part of the Time Lords and by extension the Doctor, is going too far. It's crossing the line for me at least, as is what The Sun is claiming John Hurt's role in the anniversary special.In my opinion, he's done 2 things already to completely negate the regeneration limit. He had the Doctor lie to the kid on the SJA & say that he had several hundred regenerations, & then he's taken GREAT steps to assure us that the one true fact of the show is that the Doctor lies, Thereby effectively saying that if the only thing we have to go on is the Doctor's word, then the stated fact can be thrown out the window with a simple line about how it was a lie.
On a less disappointed note, I'm thinking back to when River died in the library, and Ten said that there's only one time he could tell her his name. Most assumed that it was because they were married, but at the wedding he didn't actually tell her. The finale coming up will feature Trenzalore, where no living creature can lie or fail to answer and River's in the episode. I'm wondering if it's possible that Ten didn't mean them being married, but was referring to Trenzalore?