</SPAN><TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD CLASS=$row_color>
Brevin Din-Shay wrote:<HR></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS=$row_color>
Steve: Keep up the
awesome work, man! What an asset you are in this thread!
</TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE><SPAN CLASS=$row_color>
Thanks Brevin. I can't resist a mass...er..good debate
Today I've been taking measurements from my Graflex using digital calipers and building a model of it in a 3D program - along with a model of the activator switch, built using scaled drawings.
I'll be able to finish it up tomorrow and hope that it will help us piece things together and maybe understand how the two halves fit together.
The model of the momentary switch housing will also come in handy when trying to track the real thing down, as I can add on the parts that would normally be there (such as in that great image that Darth Saber found).
...
Now, I've been thinking and have a theory on the bottom disc.
The Linhoff mount is slightly smaller than the diameter of the tube, which means that it doesn't overlap the edges at all. So if the saber is dropped bottom first (and this one looks more like it was run over by a tank), the Linhoff mount exherts the full force of the impact directly onto the disc itself.
Do this a few times and I'm sure it could unseat an original Graflex bottom plate into it's tube.
With the mess that we see in these (great) photos, we really can't tell if that's an original Graflex bottom plate or some kind of plumbers hole plug - but what we can see is that it's domed inwards, just as though it's been dropped bottom first and the Linhoff has dented it in again.
The way the bottom disc overlaps the tube slightly, then has a bevelled edge on the outside, makes me think it's not the original Graflex plate -
unless, it's bashed in about half an inch and the putty is there to pack out the gap.
...
I'm amazed at some of the photos you have Brevin. If only someone took such clear ones of Fett's ESB rifle.
Steve