drusselmeyer
Master Member
That was one ending which was very "Grapes of Wrath."I've wanted Rachael to be shot by Deckard...but, that's just me![]()
That was one ending which was very "Grapes of Wrath."I've wanted Rachael to be shot by Deckard...but, that's just me![]()
I'd argue that the TOS movies were an exception. TMP was boring but was redeemed by TWoK, 3 was ok, 4 was great, 5 was meh, but 6 was good.Basically everything that was good in this world...
There are really no redeeming examples where the classic 1,2 or even third movie were improved upon by 4,5,6 etc in the series.
At best they just re-hash some of the good stuff from the first two films or at worst take a giant dump on them to the point of embarrassment.
Are you James Woods?!I've wanted Rachael to be shot by Deckard...but, that's just me![]()
The story line I've seen was this: Rachael exits the Spinner and walks in the snow, followed by Deckard. "I've never felt snow before", while grabbing a hand full. Her back is turned to Deckard...a shot echo in the stillness of the woods! While her blood stains the snow slowly, Deckard walks to the Spinner and heads back to the city. End creditsAre you James Woods?!
We can extrapolate from this:
That would be the majority of movies then since the vast majority of movies are made with the intent of making money. It's really only movies made by the small, obscure att house studios that get made for art and even then I'd wage that most hope to make at least their budget back.The overwhelming majority of them. The second it becomes about studios making a buck and not artists and their vision, it should never be made.
I meant ONLY making money. Most things in Hollywood these days are made by committee specifically for the purpose of making money with zero artistic merit or directorial voice whatsoever. Making your money back is great, but Hollywood hasn't been doing that lately, have they? It's all cookie-cutter garbage with an agenda and that fails miserably.That would be the majority of movies then since the vast majority of movies are made with the intent of making money. It's really only movies made by the small, obscure att house studios that get made for art and even then I'd wage that most hope to make at least their budget back.
Can you say "Snow White"?I meant ONLY making money. Most things in Hollywood these days are made by committee specifically for the purpose of making money with zero artistic merit or directorial voice whatsoever. Making your money back is great, but Hollywood hasn't been doing that lately, have they? It's all cookie-cutter garbage with an agenda and that fails miserably.
In the age of franchises, many have forgotten what EVERYONE knew back in the day: most sequels suck.
Nostalgia. Back in a distant time when people actually tried to make a quality sequel.Aliens, The Empire Strikes Back, Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan, and The Godfather Part 2 have entered the chat...
James Woods as Deckard would have definitely shot her. Of course, so would Alec Baldwin.
And most other things that come out. Snow White is just a special kind of stupid. This year, so far, has been terrible for the film industry, with 4 out of the last 5 weeks under $55 million TOTAL for all films in release.Can you say "Snow White"?![]()