CB2001
Master Member
I'm not saying catcalling and the dangers of escalation don't exist. It's just the way she worded the monologue makes it sound like she could literally be murdered by having someone explaining something she knows to her, like she'd drop dead from have some brain aneurysm or something, which didn't make sense.I haven't seen the show yet, but I did see the "catcalling conversation" completely out of context, of course. I caught some of the above discussion, and I think nobody is really in a position to trivialize the significance of anybody else's personal experiences- whether tragic or profound. So, while some folks might not be irritated by, say, catcalling - it doesn't mean it couldn't be impactful for her.
I didn't have a problem with her rant, because we wach have our own buttons to push.
But why does she say, "I do it (control her anger) infinitely better than you." Please tell me it's contextually appropriate, because it seems like she's trivializing Banner's experiences relative to her own, no?
But I agree, everyone has their buttons to push and I also agree with how she trivializes Bruce's experiences. She's a lawyer right? And a human being, right? And Bruce is suppose to be related to her, is that also right? Shouldn't she have some level of empathy when it comes to those three tings (especially the third question since, you know, she's his family) and a clear idea on what kind of trauma he's gone through?
Last edited: