Rotten Tomatoes has it at 5% rotten with an average rating of 3.6/10. Time for John McClane to retire.
While I didn't hate it, this film is certainly the weakest in the franschise. Poor dialogue, bad script, bad cinematography and a mediocre villian. I just looked up the director for this and discovered he's actually dircted very few films and the ones he did make were not very good. Why the studio trusted him with a mega franchise like this is beyond me.
The major problem this movie has is that it's Bruce Willis on screen, not John Mclaine. Yes he drops a few F-bombs and his catch phrase is said as it was in the original movie. But he was just lacking any of JM wit and sarcasm.
It's a good action movie, but it's not a Die Hard movie IMO.
THANK YOU. See, I haven't sen this movie, but that's what I keep seeing in the trailer is it's an action movie starring Bruce Willis as not John McClaine.
1-3 are solid films. The later one just doesn't have that McClaine spark. It's odd because it's THE actor who has always portrayed him, but he just seems really out of place from that role.
Now see I liked Live Free of Die Hard because he seemed out of his element much like the first film. He was totally at the mercy of the tech kid for help.
I thought number four was unwatchable, so if the consensus is that this is worse, easy pass.