Re: Classic Viper Build-up -- FINISHED!
OK, I'm now blind, so forgive any typos...... I just looked at the Viper casting and the Italieri (ex-ESCI) T-34 tracks I have. Yup, it's a match. I guess I really didn't look close enough earlier. The problem we are all having is from the soft nature of the castings we are working with. It seems to obliterate the detail that would ID it easily. The T-34 track width is the same and I finally found a small portion on the casting I have that shows the edge of the track link. Sooooo..... Greeblie Gremlin had a good hunch a few posts ago, and Mark Dickson confirmed it. Of course, I think I just lost some of my eyesight proving it to myself. gaahhh!
The whole kit has shrunk. I was able to compare the fuselage and wings to an earlier generation casting and the difference was noticeable if you put them back to back. Honestly, if you were too look at the "smaller" castings by themselves, or look at one and then look at another, it would be difficult. But back to back - it's easy to see. Maybe it's me. I look at a model and if it looks good (paintjob, construction, and crispness of details), I'm happy. To each his own, I guess.
Rob - I managed to pick up an F-4 Phantom kit at the IPMS Nats. I did check the intakes. Couple of things. First off, they seem too big. Yeah, I know that I said the casting I have has shrunk, but the intake seems too big, even taking the shrinkage into consideration. (And as "Seinfeld" has proven, shrinkage is an issue.) Secondly, the intakes on the Viper transition from a square profile at the opening to a round profile over the space of about 1 1/2". The Phantom intake just doesn't make this transition. In fact, the Phantom part maintains a squared off profile over most of its length. Seems like too much work to make the kit parts work.
Just my 2 cents.......
Gene