Please keep on topic.
I know they are both busy guys and can understand if it's hard to get to the board, but I and I'm sure the rest of us would like a little more answers to some of the questions their rebuttals brought up.
Mainly their altering of the english language to suit their needs. Their definition of a replica is a BIG one but also Mike's reply when I asked about it's condition:
(Mike) "the buckle looks like its in perfect working condition..."
The "like" is the key word here. I don't know about you, but I took it that it was NOT brand new and that it was still functioning fine. He should have said
it IS a newly made piece.
I even asked about it AGAIN since it did look brand new to me when I got it in the mail:
"It looks like it's brand new, are they still making them or was a box of unused goods found?"
Mike's reply:
"Im not sure what the story is around this piece but it looks like the real deal and I for one have been trying to find a source for these for a decade so I dont care where its from just as long as I get one"
Since, as far as I know, the only people that knew these metal replicas were produced were: Clint, Mike and John, with Michael (Evil Rocketeer) finding out about it just days before Mike contacted me and before this I have never talked to Michael. David (Cirrusx1) knew something about it since he had previously made wax patterns off of Bob's buckle that was taken apart, but as far as I know didn't know about the full run. I also have never talked to David before this. He was the one that mentioned my buckle could be a replica from the Acme camp.
How was anyone supposed to know to ask if it was a replica if no one ever mentioned them being made or available? Like people have said, Mike had a great reputation before this, and that is one of the reasons I originally didn't question him. He's in the core Rocketeer circle and it wouldn't be unusual for them to come across an extra buckle and offer it to some one they knew was building a costume.
He didn't have to give out his source, but he should have come out and said yes it's a replica, when I asked him about it, after David (Cirrusx1) mentioned it to me. And not lied and say he didn't know a thing about replicas or that his "source" didn't have the capitol to do it.
Why was he trying to be SO vague? Sounds like he had something to hide, and he did.
-Jeff