OK, i'm extemely detail oriented and I can recount a conversation with ole JDPilot where we were arguing over a dimension to the tune of 1/128th of an inch - so I get being truly anal about detail believe me.
Maybe a trooper expert can do a post to explain all the differences, but what I can see is:
-The RS looks rougher - as in more dings/warts/etc
-I see the Anovos being a touch taller and wider
-edges are a bit crisper
-Eyes on the Anovos seem a bit smaller, but that could be remedied with trimming (i can tell mine could be trimmed more, i.e. they didn't make it to their 'line')
-The bump on the right eye is less obvious on the Anovos
-The vocoder or whatever it's called is smaller on the RS
Personally, I don't see much else. I admit looking at the list, it doesn't seem short, but i wouldn't term any of those things more than minor differences at best. I don't think their target market was die hard 100% mega accurate either.
Honestly, looking at that RS - i can't help but think of the up close photos i got of the maul saber when it went on display in england (i think) just after TPM came out. It looked great on screen, and then those photos...wow...you could see paint runs and glue marks/runs, etc.
I completely see why Anovos doesn't have all the pits/bumps/whatevers. More people than not would think they got a bad one quite honestly. Outside of that, i can see noting differences, but none are worth complaining about frankly. I would be interested in asking Maul, or whomever, if they sharpened the edges or not or if that's what came out of the scan. I can't see why they'd take the time to sharpen them considering it looks like the difference between a 1/8 and 3/32 rounding, so i'd be curious as to the why there..beyond that, the differeces to me don't really rate more than knowing that this was made by this guy and this buy that guy kind of things.