Amazon's Lord of the Rings (tv series)

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.


Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Jodo

Sr Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

I was just thinking about how they would probably remake the film series or something within the next few years.
 

cboath

Master Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

ROTK was 2003 I think.

By the time an Episode 1 could air, it'll be 2019. In this day and age 16 years is pretty decent amount of time for a reboot Hell...spiderman's been rebooted twice in that time frame :) Batman 3x since '98.

You wouldn't think the rights holders would be that hard up for cash, but there's no accounting for greed I guees. 250 for the $%(*&^ in rights fees alone?? And it doesn't include all the characters?!?!?
 

Vlair

Well-Known Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

We're also living in a golden age of "Hey can we turn that movie into a TV series" with things like 12 Monkeys, Damian, Fargo, From Dusk til Dawn, Lethal Weapon etc. They're apparently doing it with Watchmen now too. I'm surprised that it's taken them this long to try and turn it into an HBO style series, on the heels of GoT. That said, the price tag attached to the rights alone is insane.
 

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Tan Djarka

Sr Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

With the expanded content we'll finally have the answer to burning questions like: "What did Frodo have for breakfast before he left the shire?" and "What exactly is that book on the upper right side of the shelf? No, all the way over. The one with red lettering on the binding. I said red lettering..."
 

StevenBills

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 

cboath

Master Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

I'm sure the theory is why develop something new when we can rehash a success? I mean, obviously it'll be a smash hit the second time, right?

---------------------

They can't do better with Fellowship or Return, but they can do much better for the Two Towers.

I'm curious as to what characters they couldn't use, though.
 

brandomack

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

There are so many other properties that would be better served. The Gemmell Drenai saga would do well as a series, cost far less up front and not be contstantly compared to an already existing epic film series.
 

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Psmith

Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

I LOVE the films! But they are plenty. I agree with brandomack. Looaads of other awesome books to mine for an amazing series! Fafhrd & The Gray Mouser!!?? I would kill for that. Elric!! A proper Dragon Lance series! Drizzt and friends!! How awesome would it be to have a live action Artemis Entreri?
 

Cephus

Sr Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

Why? That's such a stupid idea! It isn't like they're going to remake the books again, so anything that gets made is going to be something in the vein of LOTR. Just make something original! It doesn't cost $250 million for the rights!
 

Gimpdiggity

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

I'm struggling to see what a TV series would really bring to the table. Some other properties have been pretty good because they are basically just using the license for the characters. "Lethal Weapon" comes to mind, as they're loosely following the plot of the films but it's mostly just been a buddy-cop TV show using existing characters.

Now if if they were to try to tell original stories in Middle Earth, that might be a bit interesting...but I don't know.
 

Laspector

Master Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

Personally, I wouldn't want them to do this either. But if it does happen, I wish this time they would use actual little people as the Hobbits and Dwarfs. You can't get much cooler than Peter Dinklage, surely there are others. I've often wondered how much backlash there was from the Little People community with the Jackson movies for not using them for the lead actors instead of just long shots and body doubles.

There are several shots in LOTR where optically shrinking down the actors to Hobbit size just doesn't work for me. Shrinking them screws up the body proportions and a few times it just takes me out of the movie.
 

Darth Fetty

Sr Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

F*** no... Between The Hobbit movies and the Shadow of Mordor games, Warner Bros take on Tolkien's world has been horrendous (the game is fun, but story-wise and design-wise it's crap).
 

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

tcsmit29

Sr Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

A series in similar form to how Netflix/Marvel did Daredevil with adapted stories from the Silmarillion would be great! Well, if it executed properly. Because Iron Fist.
 

blakeh1

Sr Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

Part of me would love to see a series done which would follow the books a little closer and dive into some of the things glossed over in the movies

If done right, I think it would be great to get some breathing room in between just action scenes stitched together

However, I would not want what happened to the Hobbit to happen to this where they pad it out with totally non-sensical stuff that diverted wildly from the book

Of course the first sign of trouble before it even starts is that the "rights deal" does not encompass all characters and is limited
 

shaolinprophet

New Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

My theory is because movies cost so much only the projects most certain of box office success move forward. Thus all the reboot's & remake's.

Same applies here, need to cash in on GOT? Find the next surest thing in LOTR and go with that. Hundreds of others that could be new and great but they will take as little risk as possible.

This is why we are getting some great TV as the edgy and out-of-the-box shows which would never make it as movie projects get picked up for TV. I guess its the good with the bad.
 

Riceball

Master Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

I'm with everybody else, I don't see a need for LotR TV series, esp. if it's just going to be a rehash of the movies. What might work if they set in the Tolkienverse but made it an original story that dealt some lesser or unknown characters and events that weren't a part of the main story but were a part of the overall story none the less. There's plenty that they could do with either Gondor, the Rangers, Rohan, or even all 3.
 

cboath

Master Member
Re: Lord of the Rings (tv series)

The big difference is name recognition. They could easily go elsewhere much cheaper. However, the other titles mentioned here don't have remotely the name recognition. Not close. I've not heard of anything, though Dragon Lance rings a bell...but i've got no other clue about it.
 

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.

Don't want to see this ad? Sign up for anRPF Premium Membershiptoday. Support the community. Stop the ads.

Top