genZOD
Sr Member
I’m not a smart man, but I know what fake is.Fakes are like a box of chocolates, never know what you're gonna get. Fake is as fake does. Run fandom!, run!
I’m not a smart man, but I know what fake is.Fakes are like a box of chocolates, never know what you're gonna get. Fake is as fake does. Run fandom!, run!
Fakes are like a box of chocolates, never know what you're gonna get. Fake is as fake does. Run fandom!, run!
I’ve touched on this before but let me remind you all that the Jeannie bottle they auctioned had numerous paint errors, was found to be NOT screen used - by Fans! - and their item authenticity was from the supposed creator’s granddaughter. Granddaughter!!!!
If I built the HA phaser like new with a really nice paint job and such, it would be picked apart mercilessly for it’s inaccuracies.
And the criticism would be warranted.
Assuming such details were built in to cause misdirection and confusion, they worked.
Are there any replicas that have that feature? It may have been mentioned
The raised trim lines near the emitter, really get me. Are there any replicas that have that feature? It may have been mentioned, but we are on page 66 at this point.
"HeroComm endorses this auction" is not the same statement as "HeroComm decided it is real". And HA chose those words anyway, not HC. Again, HC said they trust the judgement of others who said it's real, which is not the same thing as making the claim themselves. I grant that this difference probably does not amount to anything, but what they said is what said and what they didn't, they didn't. It was pretty ballsy of HA to put that in, since they knew HC backed away from their skepticism only because of legal threats.for those of you who said HeroComm did NOT say it was the real thing and they only reported that GJ and his experts said it was real, that is NOT what HA said, they were very quick to point out that HeroComm had endorsed it as the real deal.
"HeroComm endorses this auction" is not the same statement as "HeroComm decided it is real". And HA chose those words anyway, not HC. Again, HC said they trust the judgement of others who said it's real, which is not the same thing as making the claim themselves. I grant that this difference probably does not amount to anything, but what they said is what said and what they didn't, they didn't. It was pretty ballsy of HA to put that in, since they knew HC backed away from their skepticism only because of legal threats.
They needed that to validate it, because the expert panel they hired wasn't getting the job done. All it did was drag HeroComm down with GJ."HeroComm endorses this auction" is not the same statement as "HeroComm decided it is real". And HA chose those words anyway, not HC. Again, HC said they trust the judgement of others who said it's real, which is not the same thing as making the claim themselves. I grant that this difference probably does not amount to anything, but what they said is what said and what they didn't, they didn't. It was pretty ballsy of HA to put that in, since they knew HC backed away from their skepticism only because of legal threats.
Only if there was in fact, a buyer.In any type of underhanded or shady dealing, inevitably one of the parties feels like they didn't get their due or fair share of things and ends up spilling their guts. The same will happen here. Its just a matter of time.