Hey Mike,
No offense my man, but please, in the future, read, reread, and rereread a post before you decide to respond to it. Key words in Motorfish's post that you seem to have missed are (I put them in bold for you):
Kay?
You say Motorfish's responses have no merit because he doesn't like AA.
I've come to the following conclusion and can say that AA supporters/detractors (as some call them) can fall into the following categories.
Supporters
1. Those who like the idea of a little guy sticking it to the man and the fortitude of his big brass ones.
2. Those who have obtained or have the possiblity of obtaining benefits from the source for supporting him.
3. Those who think: So what if he has recast a few pieces. His crap is rockin and he is the original maker.
Detractors. :rolleyes
1. Those who don't like the idea of the little guy sticking it to the man.
2. Those who see their own ability to make ST items diminish with the success of the source.
3. Those who have bought his stuff and think it is worthless overpriced pieces of plastic.
4. Those who see that he's lied about the origins of his molds, has been caught having recast specific items, and don't like his ethics.
I'd say I'm in category #4 on the Detractors :rolleyes list.
Which of the supporter categories do you fall under?
On a side note. You abruptly shut off your side of our conversation earlier when a staff member tried to treat us like a couple of pre-schoolers. I saw nothing wrong with our conversation and if you didn't, would like to continue it.
No offense my man, but please, in the future, read, reread, and rereread a post before you decide to respond to it. Key words in Motorfish's post that you seem to have missed are (I put them in bold for you):
Originally posted by motorfish@Jan 12 2006, 08:12 PM
Some people are thieves and liars, that's why. Some companies are evil and dishonest as well. Pure and simple.
the people who sued over copyright and won did so because they either had enough evidence claiming ownership/rights on said item, OR they already had an existing copyright on said item, which superceeded the later one.
I really doubt that LFL is out to screw SDS studios over. Why would they? Call it a hunch, but it just feels like it's the other way around, doesn't it?
(edited to put in a little more content)
[snapback]1157438[/snapback]
Kay?
You say Motorfish's responses have no merit because he doesn't like AA.
I've come to the following conclusion and can say that AA supporters/detractors (as some call them) can fall into the following categories.
Supporters
1. Those who like the idea of a little guy sticking it to the man and the fortitude of his big brass ones.
2. Those who have obtained or have the possiblity of obtaining benefits from the source for supporting him.
3. Those who think: So what if he has recast a few pieces. His crap is rockin and he is the original maker.
Detractors. :rolleyes
1. Those who don't like the idea of the little guy sticking it to the man.
2. Those who see their own ability to make ST items diminish with the success of the source.
3. Those who have bought his stuff and think it is worthless overpriced pieces of plastic.
4. Those who see that he's lied about the origins of his molds, has been caught having recast specific items, and don't like his ethics.
I'd say I'm in category #4 on the Detractors :rolleyes list.
Which of the supporter categories do you fall under?
On a side note. You abruptly shut off your side of our conversation earlier when a staff member tried to treat us like a couple of pre-schoolers. I saw nothing wrong with our conversation and if you didn't, would like to continue it.
Last edited by a moderator: