A Darth Vader Collection and Lineage Thread....

I think it would be great to get all of these helmets on a table at C5...if we're being scientific and all. :cool

I can foresee the future. Everyone gathers around the table to study these masks very scientifically.

Then, without warning:

Gino grabs the TD and runs away very quickly.

SithLord grabs Gino's ANH and runs away very quickly.

Before both realize they left their prized helmets at the table, a stunned Too Much Garlic just realized his helmet collection has grown 500% with the remaining helmets left on the table! :lol
 
Since everyone said it's all right to ask questions in this thread, I just have one, very carefully worded request based on the information made available here:

Where can I get a replica ANH facemask, helm, or full helmet, blank or finished, with the same original mold size, shape, sharpness, and retained production-made ANH sculpture accuracy/detail as, say, a DJ or SL helmet? Are helmets such as that completely impossible to obtain for any random collector (such as myself) at this point in time, or what?

Feel free to answer this question either publicly or through PMs. I just need some clarification on all of my best options from someone who is knowledgeable of the current market.

Thanks in advance and cheers,

Ryan
 
Thomas, add some spacing between comparing pictures and dont crop them as much! It just make it harder for people to know where and what they are looking
at. Just a tip. As it is now they make my eyes bleed :lol
 
Since everyone said it's all right to ask questions in this thread, I just have one, very carefully worded request based on the information made available here:

Where can I get a replica ANH facemask, helm, or full helmet, blank or finished, with the same original mold size, shape, sharpness, and retained production-made ANH sculpture accuracy/detail as, say, a DJ or SL helmet? Are helmets such as that completely impossible to obtain for any random collector (such as myself) at this point in time, or what?

Feel free to answer this question either publicly or through PMs. I just need some clarification on all of my best options from someone who is knowledgeable of the current market.

Thanks in advance and cheers,

Ryan

DJ is a one off cast, never to be offered. Private collection. As well with the SL and TD. A few more casts exist, but less than 10 combined. Heck, maybe less than 5.

To be honest, the Vader market is a tad thin. Your best bet is to wait out the junk yard for a lid offered here by another collector at the moment.
 
No, not whatever. You accused me of using "your" picture based simply on the fact that it was without lenses and grills!?!! WTF? Just got back with the previous owner: it's HIS picture, he took it, so you have nothing to complain about here. Just wanted to set that straight.

Just talked to Vader71 Via PM. He provided the pic you used to me. The angle looked to me a lot like one I took. So, my mistake.

So this time I have egg on my face.
 
Fascinating info on this thread, thanks Thomas and Too Much Garlic.

Although for newbies the helmets that are actually obtainable are minimal, perhaps you should split it into available and non available helmets if this tree is meant to help newbies?

Just to note as well that there are castings from original helmets that do not show on any of the trees, I know of at least one that is not in the public domain. Hopefully this one will be presented for the masses at some point in the future (it has nothing to with me just for the record). These trees will never be completely accurate...

Joe
 
Oh... I'm missing tons of helmets.

And yes... it doesn't really help people looking for available helmets. Currently you have the option between a few good sellers and recasters. There really isn't any wide offerings and barely any of the really high end stuff - the highest end stuff is the DS 20th C... and we're still waiting for the VP to get going again, but I haven't heard anything new. The rest is up to the owners whether they want to make more and more readily available... I can't speak for them, but I understand their reluctance but also understand people's frustration of being left with lesser choices... but we all know the reason for keeping these things so close to the chest and we don't really need to get into that.

Like my helmet thread over at The Den... this is just to list what's out there... not really what is available, any good or "legit" runs.
 
Since everyone said it's all right to ask questions in this thread, I just have one, very carefully worded request based on the information made available here:

Where can I get a replica ANH facemask, helm, or full helmet, blank or finished, with the same original mold size, shape, sharpness, and retained production-made ANH sculpture accuracy/detail as, say, a DJ or SL helmet? Are helmets such as that completely impossible to obtain for any random collector (such as myself) at this point in time, or what?

Feel free to answer this question either publicly or through PMs. I just need some clarification on all of my best options from someone who is knowledgeable of the current market.

Thanks in advance and cheers,

Ryan

As has been noted before the ability to obtain what your asking for will be limited by two things, first your ability to become trusted (why? see number one below) in the circles that have castings like this and second, have the funds at the ready when an owner is forced to sell one. Most of these high end helmets are never publicly offered so even the junkyard will not likely help.
I can see two ways this market condition could change, one a recaster get a hold of one of the better castings and starts pumping them out and they become available in quantity to fill demand or an official source (efx) pulls a cast from the mold in the archives and offers official replicas. Actually I am shocked this has not happened, but the ANH mask is not good looking up close and is a sloppy paintjob to do it right so thats going to be a hard sell to the casual fan.

:ninja
 
an official source (efx) pulls a cast from the mold in the archives and offers official replicas. Actually I am shocked this has not happened, but the ANH mask is not good looking up close and is a sloppy paintjob to do it right so thats going to be a hard sell to the casual fan.

:ninja
I would think that depends greatly on how they market the helmet. But, even if they were allowed to use the archives mold, I'm fairly sure they would be mandated to clean up the master cast they make to remove ALL the major details and damage - everything that we purists hold in high esteem - so they differentiate from the screen used, production and tour pieces so they cannot be attempted passed off as such to auction houses and less knowledgeable people.

You'll never see a direct cast off screen used or from original mold from a licensed vendor - NEVER. However, they may offer a cleaned up version of a direct cast off screen used or from original mold - the closest we can ever expect them to make it.

But sure... the casual fans would likely get pissed about a non-perfect paint job.

Interestingly enough... I like the injection molded ABS helmets as they are lightweight and sturdy... if only they used better templates to make the molds from - a near perfect in shape master for the injection ABS molds would be absolutely fantastic and would blow the Rubies attempt right out of the water. Heck, the shape and look of the DP CA looked pretty darn good if only made like the Rubies Supreme instead of in vinyl
 
Very interesting thread - as always!

I've noticed the ANH has a 'hump' on its left cheek top tube, as seen in SL's pic below.
The BM ROTJ also has this hump.
Just thought I'd point this out.


So does the VP, TM, DS 20th C, SL, PA, hero ESB, hero ROTJ etc....
 
Jeez Thomas, where to even begin with your grainy photos that show nothing similar. The tube end picture you show, well the little divot does not line up with what you are showing on the screen helmet. Not even close. I also see a chunk missing on the end up the TD tusk, which does not line up with anything you are TRYING to show on the SL.

Show me then.

How about another view since you are having so much trouble seeing detail?

TSRTUBEconLeftANH2b.jpg


Not only is that indented detail lined up, the V-shaped tube convergence is also accurate. By the time of the SL or ESB masks, that is lost and softer.

Thusly....

PAESBlefttubesoftV.jpg


The SL is like this as well. Only the TD retains the sharpness in that inside space of the tube convergence and that original indentation detail seen onscreen. NOTHING else out there has that. The TD is earlier than anything else out there.

Let's not even delve any further into your photos. I won't give them the credit that you do.
Because you are incapable of showing me otherwise. You just talk. But you show nothing. You have no idea about details or how they are related among different castings and you show no knowledge either in that regard.

Let me say this, since you are getting offended that ANYONE dare to question the mighty SithLord...buying helmet castings does NOT make you an expert. It merely means you have spent a lot of money without knowing where something has come from.
Think what you will. You know nothing about authentic castings and your comments show that. I could say you just talk and have nothing, no castings, no photos to show for your baseless criticisms.

I'm still waiting for you or anyone else who thinks they are an expert to point out a major detail on the top left cheek...that should be on authentic ANH and ESB castings. I'll give you a hint.... it has a curve to it.

You and no one else seems to have any idea, huh? Where are the experts now?

TopcheekVad1.jpg


How should this look on an early casting?

I'm the one that teaches people here about details. I see no one else doing that.

I notice you did not attempt to refute my statement that no one knows the origins of the TD.
Qui, READ WHAT I WROTE ABOUT WHAT I KNOW ABOUT THE TD.

For all of your purchasing power, you have yet to show anything about its origins.
What the blazes does anything we are discussing here have to do with my ability to purchase castings? And so what is your point? I have been honest about what I think about the TD and honest that I don't know for sure when it was cast. What do you expect? I compare the castings and look for details that appear earlier. But you don't seem to grasp that.

Grainy photos that you have been shilling for years now. Nothing new. For all we know, someone could have taken this thing and repaired a broken casting.
Casting of what Qui? Broken how Qui? At least I SHOW PHOTOS. You do nothing but be an armchair critic with nothing to show for it.

Qui, no one shows photos at the resolution I show, at the magnification I show, and with the type of attention to detail that I show. Nobody. If you want to prove me wrong then find a casting with better details, with earlier details than the TD instead.

The tube ENDS show a huge difference. Where is THAT on screen? Show us how the saw gouged into the triangle on the end of the TD. Thomas, that thing has been tampered with, concealing its origins.
Qui, the tube ends were cut. Don't you get it? Why would cut ends show up onscreen? And yes, if you studied castings you would notice something about how the triangle itself was cut and then later on filled in. But it seems you don't remember the TD origins thread on TPD, how convenient for you.

Bottom view of the 20th C....left tube end shows invasion into side of the mouth, right tube end doesn't. Why this asymmetry? Why does one side of the mouth have the corner cut out and the other side not? Well funny enough the TD has the same asymmetry but in the way the tube ends were cut. Below the 20th C image is the TD on the left in that area seen from below and the SL on the right showing the exact cut line. This is even clearer on the TM ESB but I'm not permitted to show that.

20thCtubendsBL2b.jpg



It isn't a coincidence.

Didn't you ever wonder why there is that asymmetry in the tube ends were they meet with the corners of the mouth when viewed from below? No, obviously you didn't because you don't take the time to examine castings.

One explanation for the asymmetry in relation to the cut tube ends on the TD ANH is that at some point the tube ends were cut on the original ANH and reworked. It does appear that the tube ends changed during the ANH production (see below), and it is NOT a result of the angle of the image because you cannot duplicate that effect with a real mask.

VaderANHtubechangeMs.jpg



The TD has come from a mold no one knows of, or it was tampered with to hide repairs. Nothing jives with anything else you are trying to show. The only thing that is remotely similar is the hump Howard pointed out which you have neglected to show. How could you miss that with all of your handling?
You've got to be joking. That hump is nothing new. Just because Howard points it out doesn't mean I missed it. :rolleyes Also, you put so much weight on a hump someone else pointed out for you, and you follow that as some kind of problem? Hello? That hump is on everything Qui. So how could one use the hump as a basis to define a place in the lineage if everything has it? Logic? None. Yet you like to follow others even though you have no idea whether that hump contributes to the argument or not, again indicative that you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to details.

And Qui it doesn't matter if I know or don't know where the TD came from AT THIS POINT, it has details that are earlier than anything else out there. That's the point. That's why it goes in the tree where it goes. And I've outlined IN DETAIL previously why I think it goes there. But that doesn't seem to be enough for you. Because you are simply on the anti-SL bandwagon yet again.

Why not show us all the original CIV pic you blew up to look for your little bump? Let the people decide.
Why don't you study the details yourself Qui and prove me wrong? Get the CIV photo yourself. Anyone who photographed the CIV mask CAN PROVE ME WRONG.

Oh, and one more point...you CANNOT get any kind of accurate measurements just from photos.
DID I MEASURE ANYTHING? :confused

I am showing size relationships between masks. Direct, side-by-side size relationships. Hello!
 
In my view I think it either came from the UK mold (a name the community is calling the mold that is the father of the screen used ESB helmets) or from a mold off a cast from that mold. That's the likely scenarios... Thomas is still trying to piece together the origin.


Gee I wonder who was the first to make the distinction and to give the name to the UK and US molds? Hmm? I did, not "the community". That came after I got the SL as it became clear there was a family of US masks without tabs and UK masks with tabs.
 
Wow Thomas...you know what? You are the sole reason the fun gets sucked out of collecting. You keep showing the same things hoping against hope that we will all see what you see. When we do not, you get your underwear in a bunch and post MORE useless drivel which also shows nothing. Remember doing it over the Ainsworth stuff? I do. Have you admitted you were wrong there? I believe the rest of the collecting community has seen him for the fraud he is.

What are we supposed to see in your images? I don't see the image you have tried to highlight. I doubt if anyone looks closely, as you have begged us all to, they will see it either. It called being myopic. I will stress this again...you "examining castings" means doodly squat in the big picture because not one single person on the RPF knows what happened to the original mold, how many masks were cast from that mold, where those casts are nor where they were used. That is fact.

So what, I haven't spent $6000 on a helmet. So what, I have not given money to a person I despise just to "examine" his helmet. Have you bothered to strip the paint from the TD yet? Are you afraid of what you may or may not find?

I am done giving you any kind of acknowledgment in regards to anything other than owning some great castings. That doesn't make you an expert. What have you even crafted? I know you have offered castings, but do you know the intricacies of pulling from molds? I don't, which is why I ask questions and do not assume to be the know it all.

You cannot accept that you may not know anything. There is a hell of a lot I do not know, in regards to Vader. You know what though, I ask. I ask everyone. This is how knowledge is gained. I never presume to know it all. I will even readily admit that I do not know as much as you do about some of the things. I do know that you are TOO CLOSE to the TD to be objective about it. How long have you been trying to force its lineage, Thomas? How many threads have we seen where you drum it up, over and over and over...and are shot down equally as often by people with more knowledge than EITHER of us? Did you think to try it here and people would not remember?

As far as you measuring from photos, you are the one who said you could tell where something goes on any lineage tree via photos. How can you do that accurately? You cannot. Let's not get Mac in here to talk about lens distortion and "6 feet!"

Frankly, Carsten seems to have a more accurate tree.
 
We'll see how light years ahead your thinking is....

Here's an in-depth explanation of the Don Post lineage of helmets.
You can take the in-depth version and integrate it into chart form.
Bold text indicates a generational change.


UK ANH mold base casting sent to Don Post (to use as basis for their commercial mask line.)

Prove it. There's nothing to indicate that. Don Post used the original ANH. They had the original costume at DP studios, Gino.

DP heavily modifies that casting in an attempt to make the helmet more symmetrical.
(Which later gets abandoned for an original sculpt-known as the cheap plastic DP original Vader mask).
That isn't your original theory Gino. You didn't work for someone who worked for DP did you? You know who did.

This modified casting became the DP ANH1 master.
This modifiet helmet is then molded by DP and becomes the DP ANH1.
And where are these helmets you give names to Gino? You are making up a lineage and giving names to hypothetical castings. I name real castings, not hypothetical ones.

All we know is that DP had the original ANH helmet and molded it. Then something from that was obviously modified and led to the GH/Fyberdyne line.

A DP ANH1 casting has a cabinet latch affixed to the forehead as a means to try to keep the dome secured to the forehead.
This helmet is molded again and becomes the DP ANH2 casting.
Oh, really? When did they secure the latch Gino? And what makes you know for a fact that there was no latch on what you call the DP ANH1? The father of the Fyberdyne had a latch. You are giving that its own generation beyond whatever it was that DP finally ended up making from the original ANH. That shows lack of parsimony, you are adding more generations than you even know about.

DP sells off it's only known remaining DP ANH1 casting to Jeff (JW).
DP ANH1 casting becomes the JW ANH1 master.
That's a lie. Where is this casting? You know Jeff and yet you have never shown anything like that. You've only shown your GH ANH, GH ROTJ, and Jeff castings that look like them.

Jeff got a casting from the RS mold, and was selling castings himself in the early 1990s. Don Post never dealt with Jeff W. Don't try to paint what Jeff got as coming from DP directly because that isn't true.

By the way, Jeff got his ROTJ helmet WITHOUT PERMISSION and made a copy for you WITHOUT PERMISSION. That makes him a recaster. The person Jeff got the helmet from would not have given Jeff authorization to make copies.

THAT is why Jeff doesn't post here. You have been using this Jeff story against GH to bolster your own copies of his castings.

Jeff has to state his case for himself here (and there is nothing stopping him from doing so).

DP also sells off it's only known remaining DP ANH2 casting to JW.
DP ANH2 casting becomes the JW ANH2 master.
Oh, so then I suppose Jeff has a DP casting with an original forehead latch in it? Show it then.

This is where the JW ANH 1 and 2 split off into different branches.
I'll mark them with an **SPLIT**
l
l
l
l
**SPLIT**

The JW ANH1 master (the one without the forehead latch) is molded and becomes the JW ANH1
You are creating a tree from? What? Where is the casting? We need a photo to include it in the tree, Gino. It has to be a real casting not something you made up.

As to keep the risk of being recast low, JW only ever sold JW ANH1 castings to two people. Myself and GH. My casting was sold years ago.
Why is that? Why sell it if it has such provenance? :rolleyes

And you don't seem to recall that JW didn't sell GH anything, they traded. But I guess that slipped your mind?

What?
l
l
A JW ANH1 casting is sold to GH and becomes the GH ANH1 master.
GH recasts it as well as a set of chest armor without JW's permission (according to JW) and that becomes the GH ANH1.
JW got his armor from a source he was not authorized himself to make copies of Gino. And again, they traded, it wasn't a sale. And just as GH provided no stipulations as to what he traded Jeff, so to did Jeff provide no stipulations to GH. So if you are going to accuse GH of recasting yet again, I'll remind you and the mods that we've been through this before but it seems Gino won't quit wrongfully accusing others of recasting.

A GH ANH1 casting is heavily cleaned up/modified and then molded.
This becomes the GH ANH2.
l
l
The GH ANH2 casting are what was sold to people (the one with the extra wide neck).
Funny how the casting you showed coming from Jeff was basically identical to the GH master. And the copies GH sold from the first run only had the right nailmark modified, nothing else. The second batch had narrower necks but that was all. And you know it.


**SPLIT**

The JW ANH2 master (the one with the forehead latch) is molded and becomes the JW ANH2.
It was clear the JW ANH2 master had been much more cleaned up and warped than the JW ANH1 master, but JW did not know why, and the person from DP who sold them to him did not know why either.

l
JW sold lots of JW ANH2 castings back in the late 80's early 90's. He sold some of them to a place in LA called Steve's Lost Land of Toys, who sold them for him via consignment.
So much for your theory....the warped Fyberdynes were simply poor Fyberdyne copies, Gino. And it wasn't in the late 80s, it was in the early 90s.

You are thinking of castings like this as being the JW ANH2??? So you are saying Jeff sold castings like this? Come on.

marcvs662.jpg



Here is the Fyberdyne as Jeff was selling them sitting next to the Darth Jones ANH mask. So the ones that Jeff were selling were not the ANH2 as you call them, but the ANH1 as you call them. Or just the Fyberdyne, because there is no ANH1 and ANH2. Just the Fyberdyne and bad copies of them.

FyberdynevsDJANH2.jpg


l
l
Fyberdyne buys a JW ANH2 casting from Steve's Lost Land of Toys.
l
l
The JW ANH2 casting becomes the Fyberdyne ANH master.
l
l
The Fyberdyne ANH master is molded.
l
l
Those casts are the Fyberdyne ANH1.
l
l
Fyberdyne ANH1 castings are made available to only a small handful of people.
l
l
Due to the loss of the original Fyberdyne ANH1 dome mold, a new hand scupted dome is created and paired with the Fyberdyne ANH1 castings
Come on, where was this mold? If you say there was a Fyberdyne ANH1 then show the dome. Yet you say that the ANH2 has a resculpted dome? Resculpted from what? The ANH1? So were the handful of ANH1s sold with domes? If so then why didn't they just remold an ANH1 dome? Logic?

l
l
This creates the Fyberdyne ANH2 and was made available on a larger scale than the Fyberdyne ANH1
Funny because all the Fyberdynes had latches on them.

The story of the JW ROTJ goes like this. LFL sent MB Prod. a LFL tour helmet casting to use as the basis for their life size Vader statue.
This tour helmet mold is one with the ring cast into the top of the helmet, not the Rick Baker tour helmet mold in the archives.
I'm the one who said that the ILM mold was made by Rick Baker, remember that the neck time you refer to the ILM mold by that name. Again you are using information I provided, as usual.

Later MB sold that original LFL tour helmet casting to JW.
No, Gino. That is a lie.

MB would never have let Jeff have ANYTHING. If Jeff got anything through knowing MB, then they were obtained underhandedly, without MB's permission. MB has never dealt with JW, Gino. The mods are at liberty to contact MB and verify this.

JW molded this helmet (JW ROTJ) and sold one casting to GH, and also a casting to myself years later. I sold off my copy years ago.
GH recast the JW ROTJ without his permission (according to JW) and sold copies (GH ROTJ).
Gino, why is it that in my thread you bring up yet again a matter that was resolved years ago? It was Jeff's word against GH, but now it is Jeff's word against GH and MB. Which means you accused GH of recasting when Jeff himself is a recaster and that is why he doesn't post here.

You have simply used Jeff as a means to discredit GH, as you do with everyone else here that threatens your ego in some way.
 
Wow Thomas...you know what? You are the sole reason the fun gets sucked out of collecting. You keep showing the same things hoping against hope that we will all see what you see. When we do not, you get your underwear in a bunch and post MORE useless drivel which also shows nothing. Remember doing it over the Ainsworth stuff? I do. Have you admitted you were wrong there? I believe the rest of the collecting community has seen him for the fraud he is.

Qui, why do you bring up Andrew Ainsworth? He's still selling helmets so I was right. I was right about how the case would go. I argued about the details on his stunt helmet and how I thought the case would proceed and I discussed the legal arguments of the case. So why do you bring that up? You want me to post what posted in those threads here? Give me a break. You are the one that takes the fun out of this thread with your nonsense.

STAY ON TOPIC.

What are we supposed to see in your images? I don't see the image you have tried to highlight. I doubt if anyone looks closely, as you have begged us all to, they will see it either. It called being myopic. I will stress this again...you "examining castings" means doodly squat in the big picture because not one single person on the RPF knows what happened to the original mold, how many masks were cast from that mold, where those casts are nor where they were used. That is fact.

What you say makes no sense and offers nothing. I show clearly details that the TD share with the original ANH. And you still haven't told me what is on the cheek surface because you think you know it but when it comes down to it, it is all hot air.

So what, I haven't spent $6000 on a helmet. So what, I have not given money to a person I despise just to "examine" his helmet. Have you bothered to strip the paint from the TD yet? Are you afraid of what you may or may not find?

Again, why do you find a need to bring up how much I spend on a helmet? What bearing does it have on discussing lineage? Hmmm Qui? Listen to yourself.

I am done giving you any kind of acknowledgment in regards to anything other than owning some great castings. That doesn't make you an expert. What have you even crafted? I know you have offered castings, but do you know the intricacies of pulling from molds? I don't, which is why I ask questions and do not assume to be the know it all.

I don't know everything about mold making, but I certainly know a lot more about authentic castings than you do. Yet you continue to question me about details which you know nothing about and for which you offer no other comparisons or valid arguments to the contrary.

You cannot accept that you may not know anything. There is a hell of a lot I do not know, in regards to Vader. You know what though, I ask. I ask everyone. This is how knowledge is gained. I never presume to know it all. I will even readily admit that I do not know as much as you do about some of the things. I do know that you are TOO CLOSE to the TD to be objective about it. How long have you been trying to force its lineage, Thomas? How many threads have we seen where you drum it up, over and over and over...and are shot down equally as often by people with more knowledge than EITHER of us? Did you think to try it here and people would not remember?

Why don't you sit back and just learn then? You reject the TD out of hand, yet you say you ask and claim to be open to new information. But you are not. Because I present the TD you reject it.

As far as you measuring from photos, you are the one who said you could tell where something goes on any lineage tree via photos. How can you do that accurately? You cannot. Let's not get Mac in here to talk about lens distortion and "6 feet!"

Frankly, Carsten seems to have a more accurate tree.

I can. I can tell if a casting is smaller in relation to the armor than it should be, for example, I can tell in relation to the chestbox as well. It isn't that difficult if you are experience, Qui.
 
Another lesson about the TD...

The right barb-shaped indentation on the right eye corner of the TD...nothing else beats it...not the SL ANH, not the Paul Allen ESB, not the VP or 20th C, and yes it is present on the original ANH. Only smoothed out remnants remain on later castings.

TDSLPAORIGReyecornerDet3b.jpg


Most images of the original ANH don't even show that area as it is in shadow most of the time.
 
A DP ANH1 casting has a cabinet latch affixed to the forehead as a means to try to keep the dome secured to the forehead.
This helmet is molded again and becomes the DP ANH2 casting.
DP ANH1 casting becomes the JW ANH1 master.
DP also sells off it's only known remaining DP ANH2 casting to JW.
DP ANH2 casting becomes the JW ANH2 master.

The JW ANH1 master (the one without the forehead latch) is molded and becomes the JW ANH1

As to keep the risk of being recast low, JW only ever sold JW ANH1 castings to two people. Myself and GH. My casting was sold years ago.

A JW ANH1 casting is sold to GH and becomes the GH ANH1 master.
GH recasts it as well as a set of chest armor without JW's permission (according to JW) and that becomes the GH ANH1.

A GH ANH1 casting is heavily cleaned up/modified and then molded.
This becomes the GH ANH2.

The GH ANH2 casting are what was sold to people (the one with the extra wide neck).

The JW ANH2 master (the one with the forehead latch) is molded and becomes the JW ANH2.

It was clear the JW ANH2 master had been much more cleaned up and warped than the JW ANH1 master, but JW did not know why, and the person from DP who sold them to him did not know why either.

JW sold lots of JW ANH2 castings back in the late 80's early 90's. He sold some of them to a place in LA called Steve's Lost Land of Toys, who sold them for him via consignment.

Fyberdyne buys a JW ANH2 casting from Steve's Lost Land of Toys.

The JW ANH2 casting becomes the Fyberdyne ANH master.

The Fyberdyne ANH master is molded.

Those casts are the Fyberdyne ANH1.

Fyberdyne ANH1 castings are made available to only a small handful of people.

Due to the loss of the original Fyberdyne ANH1 dome mold, a new hand scupted dome is created and paired with the Fyberdyne ANH1 castings

This creates the Fyberdyne ANH2 and was made available on a larger scale than the Fyberdyne ANH1


This single comparison blows your entire lineage out of the water.

GH ANH on the left, and an older Fyberdyne on the right.

GHANHvsFyberdyneM1.jpg



The GH ANH master I show here is identical to the ones sold (apart from the later group that had slightly narrower necks).

As you can see, it is identical to the Fyberdyne except for the latch.

So how could the Fyberdyne, which you say came from the JWANH2 lineage, yet you say:

It was clear the JW ANH2 master had been much more cleaned up and warped than the JW ANH1 master, but JW did not know why, and the person from DP who sold them to him did not know why either.
But you got a casting from Jeff when, back in, when, 2004? And GH got his from Jeff back in, oh, 1995? :rolleyes

But the point here is that you claim the so-called JWANH1 master had warpage problems, and that was carried over to the Fyberdyne. So then the JWANH1 lineage that led to the GH and your casting didn't have that warpage or cleanup problem?

So then how do you explain, Gino, that the GH ANH looks exactly like a Fyberdyne? :confused

Not only that, if the Fyberdyne castings were so cleaned up and warped, and yet they look identical to the GH, how does the GH compare with an authentic casting like the TD ANH?

GHANHvsMSANH2.jpg


GHANHvsMSANHsidebw.jpg


GHANHmastervsTDANH.jpg


When you make something up, you will encounter simple problems like this.

You might be able to fool most people, but not me.

The simple lineage is DP casting that was modified from the original ANH, then came the Fyberdyne, then the GH/Jeff castings.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top