Report: Fox Wants Bryan Singer Off X-MEN: APOCALYPSE | Badass Digest
Nothing confirmed yet, but I guess this was in consideration even before the movie got released. I wouldn't mind if Singer is replaced, but based on the quality and success of DOFP he deserves to be the director of this sequel as well.
"The gossip site - with a spotty track record, it's fair to note - is reporting that the studio is trying to push Singer off the project because of his recent legal troubles, ie being sued over alleged sex abuse." This basically makes the article unreliable, but I realize you posted nothing is confirmed yet. Fox hasn't stopped backing Singer. He step away from promoting DOFP due to his legal troubles, but that is all I have heard. Also, Singer's legal trouble is a civil case, meaning that the worse thing that will happen to him is he will have to write a check. From what I have heard he isn't facing criminal charges.Report: Fox Wants Bryan Singer Off X-MEN: APOCALYPSE | Badass Digest
Nothing confirmed yet, but I guess this was in consideration even before the movie got released. I wouldn't mind if Singer is replaced, but based on the quality and success of DOFP he deserves to be the director of this sequel as well.
No no no, they need to let him finish his franchise...This switching back and forth with directors is what led us to the horrors that were Origins and X3. If they want continuity, they'll do it.
Its ridiculous that First Class gets remembered by the industry as a mediocre success.
First Class was following two crappy X-men/Wolv movies in a row. It didn't make a lot of money but audiences liked it. Then DOFP followed it and made a ton of money right away on its opening weekend.
If the studio heads are too dense to understand that simple cause & effect . . .
Wolverine . . . the whole character is overdone. He is most fun as a supporting player. Wisecracking & playing off the main heroes, stepping in to kick some ass at the opportune time, etc. He should be delivered in small careful doses.
Hugh Jackman's age is also becoming a liability. It looks like he's throwing a lot of steroids at the problem. That works, but it's prone to aging the face and making bodies look really veiny. It's showing on Jackman lately.
I actually prefer Matthew Vaughn finish it. He was way better than Singer.
Well, coming from a person who spent ~25 yrs working out (10 of those years power-lifting competitively), the only way I could be any MORE certain that Jackman was taking steroids, would be if I actually saw him taking them. I don't have proof that he's doing it, but you don't have proof that he isn't. I spent my teenage/early-adult years around people who took steroids to one degree or another. And for the record, I think the only thing "wrong" with steroids is that they are illegal. If I was in charge, they would be legal, reasonably-priced, & widely available.Typical response from an uneducated somebody who probably has never worked out a day in their life. You say Jackman is on steroids? Really? Do you have proof? You do realize that his body is 70% diet, 30% weight lifting? His vascularity comes with age, years of lifting, and his muscle's demand for oxygen, not because of steroids. Also, if he were roiding, you'd see back and chest acne. And give him abreak, he's 46 now...I'd like to see there rest of y'alls faces at that age.