LOL! I didnt even see that!
DON'T FEEL BAD!!! I looked at them,TWICE = before I noticed this tag!:wacko :lol I feel a little red now! :$ Thanks Apophis!
I saw the red 2 mentioned in the description,I just didn't notice the red 2 tag on the photos! Anyway,you can clearly see that the first photo at the bottom in your post with red 5 in it-is BACKWARDS! :lol I guess that whoever put in in the magazine didn't realize this!!:wacko You can easily see that picture two,and three in your post are of red leader! Who did they think they were fooling? :confused :confused The last picture here is of them trying to figure out how to photograph this without a motorized armature. This is when they decided to use 12' inch models superglued to brass,and wooden dowels painted the same colour blue as the bluescreen behind them for diving,and immelman turns without complex mechanical devices. If you watch FROM STARWARS TO JEDI: THE MAKING OF STARWARS,you'll see what I'm talking about. P.S. I flipped the red 5 photo(here)around to face the correct angle,as the marking underneath its' fuselage is on the port(left)side. For those who wish to use this as a reference,click on the photo once when the little box shows up with the picture in it,then double click(one click,then one more after that-SLOWLY)on it to see it supersized for a better view!Nope, they're not.
But here are some that may be some small consolation to those who missed out.
The first is of Red 5 (From 'Art of Star Wars Diary 1997'). For anyone who didn't know where all the styrene chips should go on the underside.
The second is of Red 1, from the packaging of Revell's pocket kit, where it was composited with some irrelevant planet, then touched up with 4 extra red stripes to stand in for the destroyed Red 5 model. Judging by the shadows it looks like the same photo session as the notorious banned photos (which showed as much Red 1 as Red 5).
Then there are some close-ups of the ubiquitous publicity photo of Red 2. These are from a very high res publication of the photo from some old SW mag. You can actually see very clearly how ILM goes about doing X-wing window panes, or at least how to mock them up for a publicity shoot.
Thanks for the pics. I used to have that mag. Man, did I wear it out from flipping thru it so much!
Here are 4 more photos almost certainly from the same reel of film as your b/w shot of the 2 pyros on stands in the paint booth. I dug them out of the internet - page 170 or something insane like that on an x-wing google image search. They were buried deep, but out there, illustrating an auction of the original prints - hence the sellers' label across the centre. So I'm presuming it's ok to post them. Maybe they've been seen here before, but if not, here you go.
And I'm glad this thread is starting to gain some speed with a lot of great photos. Thanks all.
Sure! This is what this thread's about!I couldn't wait to get home today and post this! I get to contribute something to a good discussion here on the RPF. I've been reading back issues of the SW insider. I get this mag, flip through it and set them aside, so I've gone back over the last year and have been catching up. In the 100th issue, they are doing an article the 100 coolest things about SW. Page 32 Number 56 on the list is the X-wing fighter. They have a picture of an x that I have never seen before. it's wing markings say red1 but the fuselage is different. the cockpit is white, and there's no blast residue on it. There apears to be a grey stripe running across the nose, not far from the cockpit. It has red stripes on the nds of the engines like red 2 and the upper starboard engine has a white panel like red 2. I'll gladly scan the pic to pass it along to those that have the brains to post it.