DARKSIDE72
Sr Member
Re: Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk
SO f@#king IN!!!!
SO f@#king IN!!!!
Judging from the trailer, their Bf 109 isn't correct. The E model had clipped wings, I seem to discern the round wingtips of later models.
I just checked. They used a Hispano Buchon, a spanish-made licenses Messerschmitt, painted as a 109. Not only are the Buchons late- to post-war planes, but they use RR V-engines. The german 109 used the DB 601 to 605 A-engine (upside-down V , actually)You're right.
Maybe they just couldn't find a flyable E, for whatever reason.
Mildly annoying, but it's a small enough detail that it won't detract from my enjoyment of it.
Like the beaded dog-tag chains in Saving Private Ryan. Great movie, but those beads make me seethe with rage [emoji38]
Just saw the new trailer.
Ok. It's starting to become a little more clear. Watching the previous trailers, I thought this was going to be some deep thinking war movie about soldiers on an island who have been abandoned to die and that the world around them is trying to make them accept it, allies and enemies alike. Like I thought Mark Rylance's character was sending Cillian Murphy's character back to Dunkirk to die rather than flee like a coward. I seriously thought that's what was going on!
You could have seen the first trailer and Googled "Dunkirk" to find out what it was about... I've actually been surprised/depressed how many people I know have no idea about the evacuation at Dunkirk. I know I'm a history nerd, but still...
--Jonah
You sure don't want to spoil who won WWII either if they have any sequels!
You could have seen the first trailer and Googled "Dunkirk" to find out what it was about... I've actually been surprised/depressed how many people I know have no idea about the evacuation at Dunkirk. I know I'm a history nerd, but still...
--Jonah