And it the final cut, Bane’s voice ended up front and centerIt runs deep with Nolan. The first trailer for his Bane Batman movie got flak for Bane's speech being garbled. They hastily remixed it.
I'd say it's pretty tame. A couple scenes where a woman's breasts are shown (one during sex and then one where she's just sitting in a chair) and then there's a sex scene in a chair but used in an artistic way to demonstrate another character's perspective. None of these scenes last very long, the longest being a few minutes at most. It's not really necessary, but I didn't find any of it obscene at all.I want to see this. Maybe look at the IMAX times next week.
Was telling my parents about it, but my Mom saw there was nudity and sexual scenes, something she really doesn't like at all.
She really hated that one scene in Titanic, which was pretty tame.
So she said she won't care to see this movie, but suggested maybe I should go see it with my Dad, since he dealt with Nuclear powered submarines that also had plenty weapons. Not sure if they carried a nuke itself or not.
Just wondering how much of these sexual stuff is there, and would it be weird watching with my Dad, or is it really more brief?
I know the news can make a big deal out of something that isn't always even that bad.
Kinda what I was thinking.I'd say it's pretty tame. A couple scenes where a woman's breasts are shown (one during sex and then one where she's just sitting in a chair) and then there's a sex scene in a chair but used in an artistic way to demonstrate another character's perspective. None of these scenes last very long, the longest being a few minutes at most. It's not really necessary, but I didn't find any of it obscene at all.
Oh wow!The mix in this theater was good and we could hear everything.
Must saynI agree with you on this. Saw it for a second time and came away more inclined to say that it just isn’t for me.This movie is a serious dud IMHO.
It's basically 3 hours of OP not getting his security clearance, then defending why he should get it back and then not getting it back. His personal issues as a womaniser, clashing with the military and trying to get the world to agree to an nuclear arms agreement feature but it's all so pedestrian and the reason why is because his story is average at best. Yes he lead the program, but what's so thrilling about that...??...Nothing in particular.
The story is an interesting documentary, but it's hardy high drama. I think it's seriously overrated.
The worst part is the first test of the bomb is just so uninspiring...loud music and some balls of fire. Nothing like the real thing at all.
OK, so I diligently read all the posts before saying this, so please tell me if I am not the first to say this and that someone else already noticed it. On page one Pepperbone links this video of the real man, not a recent movie clip. Minus a few slang terms or casual conversation phrases, his diction, cadence, and overall voice are a very near match to Mr. Rogers. Watch the clip again but look away and just listen. It is uncanny.The trailer inspired me to search for Oppenheimer interviews.
For those interested, here's part of a 1955 interview with Edward R. Murrow about the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton.
I particularly enjoy his choice of words when speaking.
It's a shame that few present-day high profile individuals don't have the capacity for refined language.
Yup!OK, so I diligently read all the posts before saying this, so please tell me if I am not the first to say this and that someone else already noticed it. On page one Pepperbone links this video of the real man, not a recent movie clip. Minus a few slang terms or casual conversation phrases, his diction, cadence, and overall voice are a very near match to Mr. Rogers. Watch the clip again but look away and just listen. It is uncanny.
I would love to see Barbie nuked as well,I want a Barbie/Oppenheimer crossover flick.