When people are on another planet and they say "Remember, we're the aliens here." That bugs the hell out of me! Like you just got off a spaceship, I think the entire crew is well aware of that!
When people are on another planet and they say "Remember, we're the aliens here." That bugs the hell out of me! Like you just got off a spaceship, I think the entire crew is well aware of that!
All bricks of plastic explosive in movies seem come with self-adhesive pads so you can stick them to door frames? Every time I see explosives used to blow doors off someone just walks up and plop! the block sticks, no matter whether it's being applied to wood, metal, painted surfaces or anything else. I want some of that adhesive! It doesn't stick to anything in your bag but magically activates when slammed up against a door!
Secondly, these blocks of plastic explosive often have little electronic detonators on the surface and whenever one is set a small red LED lights up and it goes BEEP!. Wouldn't the noise and light give away the location of the explosive and the person using it?
Why do all bricks of plastic explosive in movies seem come with self-adhesive pads so you can stick them to door frames? Every time I see explosives used to blow doors off someone just walks up and plop! the block sticks, no matter whether it's being applied to wood, metal, painted surfaces or anything else. I want some of that adhesive! It doesn't stick to anything in your bag but magically activates when slammed up against a door!
Secondly, these blocks of plastic explosive all seem to have little electronic detonators on the surface and whenever one is set a small red LED lights up and it goes BEEP!. Wouldn't the noise and light give away the location of the explosive and the person using it?
I agree that they really beat the audience over the head with it in Joker but as you pointed out, it's for the casual viewer. I personally enjoy reveals like that with more subtlety (perhaps the filmmaker does too) but commercial success depends on appealing to a wide audience that might not always be as attentive to details as they should.We are seeing this more and more in movies lately - its the "flashback to hammer home the plot twist". Most recently, Joker comes to mind - when it was revealed the truth about Arthur and Sophie's relationship. Why not just let the audience (if they are even somewhat paying attention) deduce that what we saw earlier was in Arthur's mind and not reality? Or better yet - leave it ambiguous and open to the viewer's interpretation?
I feel these scenes are added as the result of screening tests and the constant dumbing-down a movie to the casual viewer.
Rather low tech, but the main "self-destruct" device used by the British Forces to damage/disable any sensitive kit before capture is a Lump Hammer!!Components of certain aircraft and vehicles do (and did) in the military. But, no 'self destruct' button I'm aware of other than in some spy planes (because you wouldn't want a bad guy nation getting their hands on a largely intact U-2 or SR-71 in the height of the cold war).
Most self-destruct in the military was instructions on what to do if you're going to lose something you want to deny to the enemy. For example, plenty of soldiers would tape thermite grenades to the steering columns of Jeeps in WW2. That way, you only had to yank the pin and run and the Germans/Japanese wouldn't be able to drive it later from the quick way to disable it. And the 'Norden' bomb sights on many US bombers was considered a secret level device as to how it worked. the bombardier, if going to bail out or if the plane belly landed on enemy soil, was to take his .45 auto pistol and pump at least one round through the center of it.
I also know B-52s had self-destruct buttons for some devices on the plane, but I don't know if they still have that.
I worked on a test of some new M1 tank upgrades right before 9/11, and there were ways to disable some of the stuff connected with that, but I can't go into the details.
Now, as for movies, I think 'Alien' had the most realistic and plausible self-destruct mechanism in all of sci-fi history. There was a very specific and lengthy procedure which was even marked how to 'scuttle' the Nostromo if ever needed. You could even read how to do it off the inside cover of the panel Ripley opened. I can think of several reasons why you might want to be able to nuke a large space ship in transit, and it was pretty clear they were just melting down some manner of fusion engines by cutting off the cooling (perhaps like a crown sheet failure on a steam locomotive). "Nuclear bolt" is mentioned in the directions, though...
View attachment 1060572
View attachment 1060573
- Wilhelm Scream. I'm not really sick of it, but there should be some rules to how it's used: It should be used for comic effect. It shouldn't be used when an actual named character dies, only background characters. It shouldn't be used as a serious scream, etc.
I really am. It was one thing when it showed up as a sly wink at the audience, but it's just everywhere. Enough already. It's been in more than 400 movies and TV shows. It isn't funny anymore. It's just obnoxious.
I was watching a Mythbusters episode the other day and Tori shoots Grant, Raiders of the Lost Arc style, and they used it there for the comedy value but they don't slap you in the face with it. I also believe they have used it in a few other episodes for comedic effect.
Yes, that's real world. You often find the words 'serial killer' in the tag line description of the movie when scrolling Netflix, etc. TV police shows also have an excess of serial killers as the bad guy. One person killing a lot of people, like in a Steven Segal movie, is indeed part of action, while a serial killer is a different beast, movie or real world. That isn't as over-used as 'terrorists', but still over-used.From what I've heard killers don't get classified as a serial until their third kill and most people want a lot of action which for the most part means a lot of bodies which makes for a serial killer if it is just one person.