keep the bottom one and sell the other.
Im never parting with the nos. And i really like the one i got from you even tho its a male. You can hardly tell. And i like how you weathered it. Fire right?keep the bottom one and sell the other.
Im never parting with the nos. And i really like the one i got from you even tho its a male. You can hardly tell. And i like how you weathered it. Fire right?
Oh yeah! Thats some frakin eye candy right there! The lines are so crisp on a new one. The inconel is gleaming. For lack of better words. But you just know its never seen an install. Its lovely!
I have been following this thread for a long time. Have been "building"mine for a few years. Have some parts, some I need. I just wanted to weigh in on the AN/M2 discussion about the boosters. My father is an avid gun collector, mostly from the first and second world wars, and I have been in it as long as I have been alive (30+ years, don't want to giveaway my real age and admit I'm an old fart, lol) He also used to be a licensed manufacturer and FFL. As far as the boosters go, so many companies made these for the war it isn't even funny. We have a few made by about 4 or 5 different manufacturers and even the American firearms were made by different companies, especially the M1 and Enfield. C'mon IBM and Rock-Ola (the jukebox maker) made firearms during the war, and so did GE. The AN/M2 had to variants, the British and the G.I. and the AN/M2 is a variant of the M1919 and it had 7 variants of its own.
That being said, labeling some of these boosters as fake might be premature. Not all guns had chrome barrels and not all guns were made to the same specifications. I have had parts from one gun not exactly match another, some with different tool marks and some variations so big, you have to wonder what the hell they were thinking/doing. Back then, everyone made stuff for the war effort and most of it from the middle towards the end was slapped together as fast as they could crank them out. I am not saying the ones labeled as fake, are not, but not every one is going to be the same, have the same shape, markings, etc. My father has one that has a chrome barrel and one that does not. I am assuming the one that doesn't was made towards the end of the war and they were cutting costs and time to just get them out, which I have seen them do to other firearms, vehicles, etc. I would hate to fire the one without the chrome barrel because it would rust faster (Thats mainly what it is for, so it wouldn't get so dirty/worn so quickly, that and reliability), but for all I know the one we have that doesn't have the chrome lining, it could have worn off cause these guns were used and used hard. I guess the main tell tale sign would have to be the weld. I have not come across one that hasn't had one, but then again I haven't seen every single one made, so it wouldn't surprise me actually if a few didn't, cause like I said, they wanted to make them as fast as they could.
Just my 2 cents. Good information here though! Looking forward to seeing more.
View attachment 1097054
I have been following this thread for a long time. Have been "building"mine for a few years. Have some parts, some I need. I just wanted to weigh in on the AN/M2 discussion about the boosters. My father is an avid gun collector, mostly from the first and second world wars, and I have been in it as long as I have been alive (30+ years, don't want to giveaway my real age and admit I'm an old fart, lol) He also used to be a licensed manufacturer and FFL. As far as the boosters go, so many companies made these for the war it isn't even funny. We have a few made by about 4 or 5 different manufacturers and even the American firearms were made by different companies, especially the M1 and Enfield. C'mon IBM and Rock-Ola (the jukebox maker) made firearms during the war, and so did GE. The AN/M2 had to variants, the British and the G.I. and the AN/M2 is a variant of the M1919 and it had 7 variants of its own.
That being said, labeling some of these boosters as fake might be premature. Not all guns had chrome barrels and not all guns were made to the same specifications. I have had parts from one gun not exactly match another, some with different tool marks and some variations so big, you have to wonder what the hell they were thinking/doing. Back then, everyone made stuff for the war effort and most of it from the middle towards the end was slapped together as fast as they could crank them out. I am not saying the ones labeled as fake, are not, but not every one is going to be the same, have the same shape, markings, etc. My father has one that has a chrome barrel and one that does not. I am assuming the one that doesn't was made towards the end of the war and they were cutting costs and time to just get them out, which I have seen them do to other firearms, vehicles, etc. I would hate to fire the one without the chrome barrel because it would rust faster (Thats mainly what it is for, so it wouldn't get so dirty/worn so quickly, that and reliability), but for all I know the one we have that doesn't have the chrome lining, it could have worn off cause these guns were used and used hard. I guess the main tell tale sign would have to be the weld. I have not come across one that hasn't had one, but then again I haven't seen every single one made, so it wouldn't surprise me actually if a few didn't, cause like I said, they wanted to make them as fast as they could.
Just my 2 cents. Good information here though! Looking forward to seeing more.
Also, without the chrome, these boosters cannot perform their intended function. So, if someone found a booster with all other correct features, but no chrome, its either a part thats seen A LOT of use or its a well made fake. Its up to each individual to decide if they want to take the risk or not. Just be informed. The spitfire boosters just have too many other things wrong with them besides the chrome to be anything but fakes.