Sabine has already been cast for the AHSOKA show, & I believe Lars Mikkelson being cast as live-action Thrawn was the prevailing rumor last summer.If they introduce Thrawn in live action, they'll also have to bring in Ezra Bridger and Sabine of course, since both of those characters were important to the Rebels animated story. Plus, Ezra disappeared WITH Thrawn, so there's that.
IMHO, "I" think the getting a new ship could be an engaging plot side quest. While doing whatever he's doing like helping reclaim Mandalore, picking out new linens at Bed, Beskar and Beyond, or whatever.
Maybe doing bounties to help pay for a new ship to replace the "loaner" he's flying? 
I was only discussing this earlier on another forum..
I guess that's where I'm seeing a lot of disconnect between the fans, for something like getting a ship.IMHO, "I" think the getting a new ship could be an engaging plot side quest. While doing whatever he's doing like helping reclaim Mandalore, picking out new linens at Bed, Beskar and Beyond, or whatever.
I found it interesting that Razorcrest toys for example were still being made right up to the Tragedy episode. Hard to sell toys when you blow up the hero spaceship.
The new Haslabs Razorcrest will come with an M-80 firecracker to recreate the pivotal scene in season 2 : Episode 6! Comes with bonus Haslabs special edition ship shrapnel kit!
I think it would beneficial for all of us fans to just admit we are all hypocites. There is so much supposition built into each show and movie that we cherry pick what to use in our discussions. Honestly, i can't stand the argument over "was it seen or said in the movie" or is it deductive reasoning and inferred because the writers change, correct, uproot story lines and character developement all the time. Of course, we as fans, want our cake and eat it too and we aren't wrong for that because let's face it and be truthful...whether it's head canon "believed" or actually seen and heard makes no difference in the spectrum of "intent" and context". Perception, direct or indirect, is reality to the viewers who are paying to see it. We've seen it a million times folks where we banked on what was actually said to lead in a direction we all expected and it doesn't happen. We have all banked on inference and supposition to do the same thing and as Jake Skywalker said, "This isn't going to go the way you think"...lol
I have to agree. Some claim they aren't bound by the story they created in their heads about these characters over 40 years, and yet feel compelled to rip everything apart. I admit, I'm open to the story and seeing where it goes, but sometimes things are done that make me question reality, like the Vespa gang disconnect with them being clean and "unlived in" while the rest of this setting is worn and gritty.
There's still mysteries to be revealed, and aliens to blast.
Or Ronto Wraps.
To be fair. I’d be pretty cranky too if my little brother wet the bed and his grandma.
Yes but you're drawing a false equivalence between the examples you mention. Han's blaster didn't advance the plot of SW '77. He had one, yes, but it was in no way a mcguffin. So who cares where he got it.
I gotcha, but your last point about being appropriately discerning was what my question was referring to.
So, is Boba himself one of those story elements that need explanation or not? This is rhetorical of course because everything about him lends to the advance of the plot...the armor, his ship, taking his helmet off or not. Because it's "his book" the audience wants explanation. Deep down we all use imagination and supposition and we want both to work in our advantage all the time, which really is what film makers and storytellers are expecting the audience to do to some level. When it doesn't fit our requirements we point the finger. When it fits we cling to the canon, but ignore all the other problems that exist that we are okay excusing. We are all guilty of it so, we should get off our high horse. We strain at a gnat and swallow a camel as long as it fits our "vision" of what we "wanted" it to be. Usagi Pilgrim proposes a great question here...
I've said it twice, now thrice. No one(or place) is ever really gone. Cloners are shifty shady secret little bastards. You know they have back ups of their back ups somewhere.
And it is true, we saw the Kaminoan (sp?) "cloning city" destroyed, who knows if other cities don't exist. But also having said that, just because other cities exist, it doesn't mean they're also a cloning center. But "anything is possible" in fiction. Heck, dead, dead characters in Marvel comics/media (as opposed to mostly dead...) still keep getting resurrected through technicalities. And like you said, who knows, maybe Taun We took her work home on the weekend and had her own server in another city?
Kamino-oians maybe cloned the planet, or maybe even the galaxy, they cloned reality, they creatied the multiverse. It's all their fault.
But, of course, typical of his Bantha travels, it will be verrrry slowly on the back of the baby Rancor and take up the last 5 minutes of the episode.You know what would be interesting...
For Boba to say "This isn't worth All the hassle and wipe out All of Mos Espa and ride off into the sunset with Garsa..
And Max Rebo of course
