Since this thread was mentioned elsewhere, I thought I'd post my question here rather than there just to keep most of this information in one spot...
Ok, we know the ERTL falcon side walls need to be lowered and the cockpit tube needs to be enlarged. The problem with enlarging the cockpit tube is, IMO, that the hull is too flat making this modification look a bit off when it really isn't. I've seen on Tim Ketzer's site where he increased the thickness of the hull at the center to fatten his ship up a bit, but from what I can see that results in docking arms that slope downwards from the center toward the outer edge which is also incorrect.
My question is, could it be that the hull doesn't need to be thickened in the center at all but instead the hull surface needs to be curved from the center outward to meet the side walls?
Can any of you Falcon experts confirm or disprove this theory for me? Would reproducing the correct curve result in a fatter appearance while preserving the alignment of the docking arms and improve the overall look when combined with the larger cockpit tube? If so, then what is the proper curve for the hull (I don't think I've seen that mentioned anywhere)? I'm aware that a lot of surgery would be necessary to make this work right... but it's ERTL - what else is new?
Mark Snyder
Seoul, Korea