The new novel 'Master and Apprentice' has finally given us the whole prophecy.
It's interesting to note that there is no mention of the Sith. Misread the prophecy could have been? Either way I don't think this undermines what Anakin did. He still brought balance. He still destroyed the order of Sith Lords when he destroyed Vader and Sidious. The problem is, Anakin died. Because of this, the balance was temporary.
Either way you slice it, I have a feeling we are going to revisit prophecy of the Chosen One again. It makes sense as the story comes full circle, back to The Phantom Menace.
It's also interesting to note that John Boyega came to JJ, telling him that Palpatine couldn't return. And that it messes up things. But JJ talked to John and whatever he said changed his mind.
I thought the prophecy according to the PT was that he would "bring balance to the Force". If so he did it in ROTS by destroying the Jedi order and reducing them down to two remaining Jedi and two remaining Sith.
But they are the only 2 that exist in the film universe."Luminous beings are we not this crude matter."
Two Jedi and two Sith isn't necessarily balance. After all they are just beings made of "crude matter".
Plus you have to consider that there were more then two surviving Jedi, and there are other Light Side and Dark Side religions. The Jedi and the Sith are just the two most prominent.
And there's only 1 Jedi at the end of ROTJ, yet George said that Anakin had fulfilled the prophecy.But they are the only 2 that exist in the film universe.
My argument has always been that it is not:
the jedi = good
the sith = evil.
It is
the jedi = protecting the natural balance
the sith = causes imbalance
So it is not about quantity, it is about quality.
It doesn't matter what George said, that's outside the story universe. He didn't even have the sense to put the whole prophecy in the actual movies. I doubt he even knew what the whole prophecy was when he was making the prequels! That's why his explanation doesn't make any sense to me within the context of the films.And there's only 1 Jedi at the end of ROTJ, yet George said that Anakin had fulfilled the prophecy.
That may be the Jedi mission statement from time to time, but they've never done that. They're not out there maintaining balance. They've only ever ponced around the Galaxy "doing good". If they were really about balance, they wouldn't have named the two aspects of the infinite cosmic power they study "light" and "dark", then FORBIDDEN the study of one. LoL
It doesn't matter what George said, that's outside the story universe. He didn't even have the sense to put the whole prophecy in the actual movies. I doubt he even knew what the whole prophecy was when he was making the prequels! That's why his explanation doesn't make any sense to me within the context of the films.
Sure they would.
Light = balance
Dark = out of balance
And it is the way the Jedi have been using their abilities is what is creating the imbalance as well. It caused them to lessen their connection to the force and failed to realize the Sith had returned. That’s why the Jedi for the most part were destroyed along with the Sith because the Jedi were not fulfilling their true purpose.
I'm afraid George might disagree...
- "The overriding philosophy in Episode I—and in all the Star Wars movies, for that matter—is the balance between good and evil." -George Lucas, quoted in L. Bouzereau, Star Wars: The Making of Episode I, 1999
- "In each of us we to have balance these emotions, and in the Star Wars saga the most important point is balance, balance between everything." -George Lucas, Time Magazine article, 2002
- "The idea of positive and negative, that there are two sides to an entity, a push and a pull, a yin and a yang, and the struggle between the two sides are issues of nature that I wanted to include in the film." -George Lucas, quoted in L. Bouzereau, Star Wars: The Annotated Screenplays
- "The Force has two sides - [Light and Dark]. It is not a[n inherently] malevolent or a benevolent thing. It has a bad side to it, involving hate and fear, and it has a good side, involving love, charity, fairness and hope." -George Lucas, Times Magazine, 1980
- "I wanted to have this mythological footing because I was basing the films on the idea that the Force has two sides, the good side, the evil side, and they both need to be there. Most religions are built on that, whether it's called yin and yang, God and the devil—everything is built on the push-pull tension created by two sides of the equation. Right from the very beginning, that was the key issue in Star Wars." -George Lucas, Times Magazine, 2002
I don’t know. Seems like he does agree with me.