I think more so than ever the apologists are coming out of the woodwork to excuse as many flaws as possible, and relying on the same tired old arguments as always. “The originals weren’t that good”, “it’s just a movie so enjoy it”, “you’re just determined to hate it”, “it included/referenced something from canon so I like it”, “you think all force powers should have been established and no more can be created”, and the list goes on and on. They think that to criticize the film as a film is sacrilege and whining, and that to expect, I don’t know, a competent, finished film with a plot, characters, and resonant themes is “setting your expectations too high”.
Pointing out that Star Wars has been a fractured narrative from the moment a sequel to Star Wars was penned does not make one an "apologist." Nor does enjoying the film, while at the same time recognizing its flaws.
The problem is that the overwhelming tone on this board from those who dislike the film is that anyone who likes any part of it must be wrong, an apologist, doesn't understand/appreciate good storytelling, or any number of other dismissals.
It's possible to have enjoyed the film AND recognize that, yes, the plot plays fast and loose in many, many ways. It's possible to recognize that upon examination, certain connections don't really hold up, or at least require the audience to fill in more gaps than they should (people are STILL confused by whole chase in Last Jedi, still incorrectly calling it "slow speed").
And while it's equally unfair to summarily dismiss the opinions of anyone who didn't like it, it absolutely is a fact that there were people posting negative reviews of the film well in advance of any possibility of having actually seen it, which skews the credibility of some of the hate.
They were the result of someone’s vision. I might disagree with every direction they took Star Wars, but it was the product of people at the end of the day. Not a committee, not highly-paid executives, not a corporation with the formula to infinite profits all figured out. At the end of the day, that’s what stories are about: people. We can feel when passion and humanity are absent from a film—even something like The Room manages to be more heartfelt than Star Trek: Into Darkness or Justice League.
Let's just be clear here: That "someone's vision" you're talking about is George Lucas. However he may have started, he became just as much of a corporate businessman as the very people you're demonizing for the current Star Wars. That isn't to say he didn't try to tell the stories he wanted, but profit was absolutely top of mind to him, as well.
It also is absolutely unfair to categorize the current people running Star Wars as only being in it for the money. Rian Johnson wasn't allowed to take the direction he did with The Last Jedi because The Suits felt that was the most profitable route. It was his vision for the film, for better or worse. JJ Abrams isn't the greatest when it comes to writing / finishing stories, but his passion for Star Wars can be seen in how he directs the films (or hell, even in how he directed Star Trek).