Right, it may not necessarily ruin the whole movie, but it still robs the audience of that pure moment of surprise and discovery which was supposed to be experienced during the narrative.
I don't see how Luke could turn to the dark side after resisting both the Emperor and Vader in RoTJ. He was basically untrained then so you would think he would only get stronger and wiser with age
Torn on this... It does raise the stakes INCREDIBLY... which is what MUST happen to make a story compelling...
But n the other hand, Luke throwing his saber aside and taking a crap ton of lightening in ROTJ seems to have less weight.
But on the other, other hand, it makes the reveal even more "OH CRAP WHAT HAPPENED?!?!"
Argh my brain.
Han's reaction... Leia's... the rebels... How do you bring back something more threatening than the Death Star? This would do it...
The same reason Badass Digest reported the rest and withheld this (as explained in article on page 361 that they are still not posting it), even though they all knew it for sometime now. They didn't want to spoil such a big plot detail. Devin from BAD alluded about these shakeups in the story on Twitter several weeks ago but didn't give it away. Though now most will likely start reporting it.So why is AICN not reporting this and Latino Review just report the Max v. Sydow and Kira character stuff ?
I don't see how Luke could turn to the dark side after resisting both the Emperor and Vader in RoTJ. He was basically untrained then so you would think he would only get stronger and wiser with age