STAR WARS Rebels new animated series!

I, like you and many others are tired of the strong Jedi presence and very little else in the hero role since 1999. However, the one thing about the saga is that the core story is about the rise, fall, and redemption of Anakin… a Jedi. It's a jedi story even if it's not wall-to-wall jedi. Don't get me wrong. I fully understand what you are saying and agree with your wants and wishes. I also believe that a story can exist in the SW universe without Jedi being present. I'd like to think that non-force users who were brave and had the will power, could defeat a Sith, his apprentice and an empire in a battle of good and evil.

But like I have said before, I am often impressed with what comes from LFL, I even feel the prequel story was very good, but it suffered from directorial issues which hampered its presentation. I don't dismiss a movie or series just because it does not line up with my ideas.

My hope is that Kanan is a very weak Jedi much like Luke in ESB. After all, there is a 14 year gap from the point the series begins and ROTS. How old is this character suppose to be? 29-34? If so then at the time of order 66 and most likely around the same time he went into hiding, he was 14-20? A padawan or a very new jedi along with the fact his skills have decreased during this 14 years. I am happy to see that Kanan feels the need to have a blaster by his side which I hope supports my thoughts.

Well, two things.

First, I don't mind Jedi being IN the show. The Jedi presumably still exist and are still being hunted at this point. that's part of the appeal of doing a "rise of the Rebellion/Empire" era show. You get to see the hunt for the remaining Jedi, you get to see the consolidation of Imperial power, and you get to see what made the population of the galaxy -- or a portion of it -- say "Enough" and take up arms against the Empire. The Jedi can and should be part of any story in that time period. What I don't want, though (and what it sounds like you don't want) is the sole focus to be on the Jedi, especially as portrayed in the prequels, and especially at the expense of telling the stories of other regular folks.

Second, I know what Lucas has said, but I dispute that the six films are "about Anakin." The prequel films are kinda sorta about Anakin, although I find them to be far less focused on him (or on any one thing, really) than that they feature him. Anakin is the focal point of much of the action, but you could just as easily argue that it's Obi-Wan's story. Most of that is because of how Lucas focused the films (or rather, didn't focus them exactly). I don't think he had a really clear vision from film to film, and the narrative flow of the PT shows that. That's as may be, of course. I don't think that the story not actually being about Anakin is a bad thing, per se, regardless of whatever other complaints one might lob at the PT.

The OT, though, is definitely NOT about Anakin. It's about his son, and his son's friends. Anakin is a background player in those stories, and no amount of Special Edition manipulation will ever change that. The OT simply isn't "The story of Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker," any more than it's the story of Obi-Wan or Chewbacca. Lucas may have wished it had been after the fact, but that doesn't mean that's what the story is really about. Again, that's as may be. I don't care that Lucas was wrong about what he claims the focus was "supposed" to be. At this point, I tend to disregard most of his "I always intended to"-esque statements and just take the films at face value. Regardless, the film -- again -- not being about Anakin isn't a problem in and of itself.


The OT is clearly about the Jedi, but the thing is it was ALSO about other stuff. Whereas the PT, to me, felt like it was pretty much JUST about the Jedi, and frankly, I'm bored with them. I don't mind them as part of the story. That's part of what makes it Star Wars. But there's more to Star Wars than lightsabres and force powers, and sometimes I feel like both the fandom (not you, but in general) and those in the C-suite have lost sight of that fact. I'm hoping the new ownership and the pre-OT era focus will help shift that, and that it'll also apply to the new films.
 
I, like you and many others are tired of the strong Jedi presence and very little else in the hero role since 1999. However, the one thing about the saga is that the core story is about the rise, fall, and redemption of Anakin… a Jedi. It's a jedi story even if it's not wall-to-wall jedi. Don't get me wrong. I fully understand what you are saying and agree with your wants and wishes. I also believe that a story can exist in the SW universe without Jedi being present. I'd like to think that non-force users who were brave and had the will power, could defeat a Sith, his apprentice and an empire in a battle of good and evil.

But like I have said before, I am often impressed with what comes from LFL, I even feel the prequel story was very good, but it suffered from directorial issues which hampered its presentation. I don't dismiss a movie or series just because it does not line up with my ideas.

My hope is that Kanan is a very weak Jedi much like Luke in ESB. After all, there is a 14 year gap from the point the series begins and ROTS. How old is this character suppose to be? 29-34? If so then at the time of order 66 and most likely around the same time he went into hiding, he was 14-20? A padawan or a very new jedi along with the fact his skills have decreased during this 14 years. I am happy to see that Kanan feels the need to have a blaster by his side which I hope supports my thoughts.

Agree with all of the above and based on the interviews in the announcement of this Kana character, it seems that is exactly what we are getting. A Jedi not well trained, long removed from the temple, relying on his own instinct and wits as opposed to a strong connection to the Force. He doesn't seem to self identify as a Jedi, at least in the early part of this story.

Star Wars really is the story of Luke and Anakin Skywalker as Jedi and their connection to the Force. I agree, Dan, it's a vast and rich universe with many opportunities to tell other stories, but that is a fan construct we created over the years, it's not inherently what Star Wars is.
 
'Star Wars Rebels' LEGOs, action figures coming soon

1392328974000-Kanan-figure.jpg


1392328512000-75053-front-CMYK.jpg
 
Man when did lego sets get so expensive? Well hasbro's going with the limited articulation as it saves money more than anything. Looks like they're using cheaper plastic like Playmates does with their figures.
 
It's based on the one armed fencing, also a Fencing instructor ussualy still wears this kind of armor when teaching newcomers, why just the fencing arm, better fencing coordination.
 
Look at the pictures of Kyle Katarn. I can see loads of similarities with his including one side arm armour and blaster along the saber

u6ajuteb.jpg
 
I like how it has "less" articulation like the older figures.

Less articulation yet it has the same Detailing in it, so what those little tiny plastic pegs used to make the hands wrists move and the ball joints too expensive?.


I for one wont buy a pre 2006 figure due to its bulky chunky no articulation, and really bad detailing, there`s more manly Leia`s in those lines than anywhere else! I prefer the newer stuff and now that they killed like 5 action figure lines to make way for Disney`s take over, all that's left is the black series!.

Hopefully some of the newer stuff comes out in the black series the line for serious collectors.
 
I think that is based on a real world kind of armor worn on the sword arm.

Generally speaking when wearing that type of armor the other arm would be carrying a shield thus leaving the sword arm exposed. It's probably a whole lot less common for someone without a shield to wear that sort of armor although it still makes some sense if you're fighting one handed since the other arm would be trailing and less likely to get hit.
 
What kills me, Is LFL has to have some of the better animators working in the industry if not employed than a quick phone call away, yet some how Family Guys animation of the Originals look a whole lot better than most attempts at star wars animation minus TCW. no comment on this show until it premiers. Posters and Quick video are great show me final product been duped before by a flashy ad video.
 
Less articulation yet it has the same Detailing in it, so what those little tiny plastic pegs used to make the hands wrists move and the ball joints too expensive?.

Fewer parts means fewer molds as well as less time to assemble, all of that may not seem like much but when you think of the volume that they're being produced in it starts to add up really fast.
 
View attachment 286238 Yup so can`t wait for this!!! =/

Perhaps for a moment you can consider that this program is not intended for your consumption but rather for a much younger audience? Like SW Angry Birds, not my thing but every 5 year old SW fan I know loves it. My son is just turning 1 but I welcome Disney creating Star Wars content that he will be able to enjoy before I feel it is appropriate to show him the films.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top