The badly colored lightsabers? Compared to what? Because the original Luke lightsaber from ANH sometimes, is green sometime is blue, and it has never been changed, they still remain green and blue. So I don't know what do you mean.
I think the reference is to the fact that they did rather a half-assed effort on the 2004 SEs. While it's true that in the original, Luke's (and Obi-Wan's) sabre fluctuates between aqua, blue, and occasionally white, and while some shots didn't come out properly in post-production such that the original "shiny tape dowel" look is still there, you'd THINK that in the "lovingly restored" version which changes a bunch of other stuff, that they'd bother to fix the look of the sabre properly and make it a consistent color at least. It's a rather obvious botch that isn't really justifiable.
Either you're working to preserve the originals, in which case why the hell does Greedo even get off a shot and get Hayden out of the end of ROTJ, or you're making the "perfect version" in which case don't half-ass it. There's just no good reason to have done that.
The sound? I thought 6.1 was better than Stereo.
I think he's referring to the ANH surround sound screwup which has yet to be even acknowledged as an error (but probably will on the Blu Ray version...). The error, as I recall, swaps the rear right and left channels, at least for the orchestral tracks. I can't recall if they did that with the sound effects. But the effect of it is that if you hear the brass over on the right hand side in the front, they're on the left hand side in the back. Not sure if this ALSO means that a Tie Fighter that goes screaming towards you from the lower-right to upper-left side of the screen will only sound off on the righthand side of the screen or what.
The answer that LFL's team apparently gave was "That was the way the original surround sound tracks were recorded," which, of course, brings up my previous point about whether you're trying to preserve things (obviously not) or fix things (again, obviously not or if you were, you ***ked up and are just refusing to acknowledge it).
My big gripe about those issues is one of customer service, basically. LFL has never, to my knowledge anyway, acknowledged that any of this was a mistake or poor workmanship, and has made zero effort to correct the problem or to offer early buyers a replacement disc. Why? Probably because they know that they'll do a subsequent release and fix it then, and people will just buy it again, so why incur the cost? Tell the fans to suck it and know that they'll still come back for more.
And about the extras... I know 40 hours is not enough for us, the propmakers/collectors, but for the most of the potential buyers it's more than enough, surely they won't even see them...
I can understand what you guys feel because they sometimes change the history, changing dialoges, facts, etc. But, IMO, getting better with some other things, which DON'T change the history, I'm fine with that.
On the extras issue, I actually agree with you. While it'd be nice to have ALL the extras, this obviously lets them release subsequent editions with different extras to compel completists to keep buying. It's crass manipulation of the fans, but you've got to expect that at this point. They already know you're a junkie -- why would they work to improve the product and give you the ultimate high when withholding that means you'll come back for more? How many fans are actually going to "vote with their wallets" and not buy? My bet is that LFL knows people will *****....but still plunk down the cash when push comes to shove. Thus, they have no incentive to make consumers happy. They know they can half-ass it and enough people will already BE happy, so why bother going the extra yard, let alone the extra mile?
As far as the "changing history" thing, at this point the "history" is so muddled that it almost doesn't matter. There've been a bunch of different versions -- apparently even among the theatrical releases themselves -- some with more subtle differences, some with more glaring differences.
That said, I doubt you'd find a Star Wars fan who WOULDN'T want a restored, "archival" copy of the non-SE versions of the original trilogy. The only reason they HAVEN'T done this is because (A) Lucas doesn't like them and wants "his" vision (whatever the current one is) to be the only one seen, and (B) it's probably not a good move financially. While we can say "LFL would make plenty of money!" how much would it cost to actually do an archival version, and how many people would buy it?
I mean, at this point, the only thing I'd see making sense is them releasing the blu-ray version, then using proceeds from that to fund restoration of an "archival blu-ray" version. Although, given how well the last restoration bit did...I'm not even sure I'd WANT them to "restore" it.