Star Trek Into Darkness (Post-release)

Klingons.

The more I think about their role in this movie, the more I actually start to question why the creative team chose to go with Klingons in this movie and not the Romulans..

Maybe they just wanted to get those Klingon helmets that were shown in the deleted scenes in the first film proper screen time. :lol
 
And the Romulans were never depicted as an aggressive race? I think their first appearance in Star Trek and from the last movie would dispute that. You could easily substitute Klingon with Romulan and that's it.

Klingons are a well known and recognized part of not only Star Trek but pop culture. Much more accessible for the more casual fan and they had gone to great efforts to create new Klingons back in '09 only to have them edited out. There were even initial talks to make this film center more on a Klingon/Federation conflict. They were the correct choice for this film.
 
Ok, so I did enjoy the film, despite a lot of quibbles with the logic. (Enterprise underwater made no storytelling sense. How does Earth's gravity pull the Enterprise out of orbit from the distance of the moon? Et cetera.) But these are all quibbles. Sure, more intelligent (or at least mindful) writing could have eliminated many of these issues, but whatever. It was a fun ride.

However, one thing does stand out as bothersome.

So, Khan's entire motivation is to retrieve his crew. Ok. What purpose does going to the Klingon home world serve to that end? Perhaps he made a deal with Marcus that if he went there and gave an excuse for Marcus to send someone to start a war that he would get his people back. Ok. But Khan is smart enough to not trust Marcus. So much so that he... hides his people in super-torpedoes?

Why did Khan think it was a good idea to hide his people in the torpedoes. Clearly, he expected that they would be loaded onto the Vengeance and his plan ultimately involved him somehow getting aboard to revive them. And yet... he doesn't trust Marcus, but he seems surprised that Marcus instead loaded up these super-torpedoes in the ship sent after him?

So basically, Khan's entire plan for getting his people back hinges on whether or not someone will have the good conscience to actually NOT use the torpedoes.

That's pretty idiotic for a super genius.
 
Klingons are a well known and recognized part of not only Star Trek but pop culture. Much more accessible for the more casual fan and they had gone to great efforts to create new Klingons back in '09 only to have them edited out. There were even initial talks to make this film center more on a Klingon/Federation conflict. They were the correct choice for this film.

Correct choice for popularity, not for a proper story progression. Have we all but forgotten about that super nova that will destroy the whole galaxy in 120+ years? I think that's a bigger deal than throwing in the Klingons simply because they're popular.
 
The supernova is no big deal. They know when and where it will happen and how to stop it so in time, it will be resolved. As for using the Romulans instead of the Klingons, if that happened, there would be endless posts from critics who claim they are messing with the continuity because in TOS, they were at war with the Klingons. So for JJ, consider it was his Kobiyashi Maru experience...it was his no win scenario.
 
The supernova is no big deal. They know when and where it will happen and how to stop it so in time, it will be resolved. As for using the Romulans instead of the Klingons, if that happened, there would be endless posts from critics who claim they are messing with the continuity because in TOS, they were at war with the Klingons. So for JJ, consider it was his Kobiyashi Maru experience...it was his no win scenario.

See this is the kind of stuff I just can't get excised about. Who cares? Let's just tell fun stories. Worrying about how other previous stories might fit in this universe seems a little too nerdy for me.
 
See this is the kind of stuff I just can't get excised about. Who cares? Let's just tell fun stories. Worrying about how other previous stories might fit in this universe seems a little too nerdy for me.

I agree with you. That's why i said, it was a no win for JJ. He isn't going to please everyone out there so just concentrate on making decent movies. TOS is still available if people want to watch them, I personally am looking forward to seeing how this new storyline develops.
 
See this is the kind of stuff I just can't get excised about. Who cares?

So our enlightened heroes should have the concern factor of Fry from Futurama?

Leela: Should we really be celebrating? I mean, what if the second garbage ball returns to Earth like the first one did?
Fry: Who cares? That won't be for hundreds of years.
Farnsworth: Exactly! It's none of our concern.
Fry: That's the 20th century spirit!

I find it funny how in a show like Futurama does a bit like this to prove a point, but a franchise that's not a comedic satire does it for real because, well, no one cares anymore. I don't recall abandoned plot points being the strength of any series.

Worrying about how other previous stories might fit in this universe seems a little too nerdy for me.

I'm nerdy? Guilty as charged. Worrying about something we 'like' should never be looked at as a downside. On the contrary, this is exactly what good film makers strive for when they create a product. They want you to care. If neither of us cared about anything that was going on, there would be no reason to be here to discuss it.
 
Your Futurama reference is equally as meaningless to me as I don't watch it. As this film comes to a close, I don't have any preconceived ideas where it is going to take me but I am certain I could care less about the supernova or the Dominion lurking out there, or any other Trek construct and conceit. Makes for a much more pleasurable movie going experience.
 
Really? The future supernova is a problem? Why? Why would dealing with that be a "better" story progression? So we can jump 100 years into the future when everyone is old? Sorry, that's just silly.
 
Really? The future supernova is a problem? Why? Why would dealing with that be a "better" story progression? So we can jump 100 years into the future when everyone is old? Sorry, that's just silly.

I'm not talking about waiting around for 100 years till it becomes a problem. I'm talking about dealing with it now before it becomes one. How would our crew destroy an entire sun without red matter on the other side of the Romulan Neutral Zone without being being caught? And if they're caught, how do they justify their mission to destroy a sun to the Romulans when they would like nothing more than a reason to go to war with the Federation? The only proof that Kirk has are the memories of Spock Prime. How does that not make for a potentially interesting story that could take Star Trek in a new direction?

Bryancd said:
I don't have any preconceived ideas where it is going to take me but I am certain I could care less about the supernova or the Dominion lurking out there, or any other Trek construct and conceit. Makes for a much more pleasurable movie going experience.

And yet you praise them for using Klingons because they're so popular to the general audience and they're what you expect them to use.
 
I'm not praising them, I simply acknowledge it was a smart choice and I enjoyed seeing them in this film as opposed to more Romulans. I am happy as a fan and a movie audience member.
 
Nah, I noticed them, and the Vengeance, which I09 failed to mention. Seems odd to have the Vengeance in the first place, and odd that the Enterprise isn't there, since it's the flagship of the fleet.
 
Back
Top