<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
Thats YOUR OPINION and one not based on any facts or reality. I can't believe you still believe that fairy tale that prototype helmets were presented to LFL for approval. :lol
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
Now thats a good one. :confused He was given the chance to defend and he ignored it, yet somehow you still "fail to understand" :lol Understatment of the year.
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
Yeah he learned AA didn't know anything and was as mad as the rest of us that we were lied to.
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
Oh well in that case, its ok everyone, Thomas wasn't there, didn't hear it or read about it and because of that its not true.... :lol
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
Wow, your so smart to know everything Matt does, maybe AA should have had you defend him. Oh thats right, he never showed up.
Fun indeed.
What is highlighted in bold is false. There were no models or sculptures prior to AA presenting the prototype helmet(s) to LFL. But they needed to add that because my opinion is that they would not win the case on the basis of McQuarrie's paintings alone.
[/b]
Thats YOUR OPINION and one not based on any facts or reality. I can't believe you still believe that fairy tale that prototype helmets were presented to LFL for approval. :lol
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
I fail to understand how if someone defaults that then the defendant can add on whatever he wants to the accusations. It is not ethical to do so without permitting defense by the plaintiff...IMHO.
[/b]
Now thats a good one. :confused He was given the chance to defend and he ignored it, yet somehow you still "fail to understand" :lol Understatment of the year.
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
The bottom line is, TE took what he could learn from AA and turned it against him.
[/b]
Yeah he learned AA didn't know anything and was as mad as the rest of us that we were lied to.
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
I have no idea what conversations Matt had with AA, but it would be impossible for AA to have said this. It is false. And that is not based on anything I've heard or read from AA. There are at least three people in charge of aspects of the production at that time who would also know that this is not true.
[/b]
Oh well in that case, its ok everyone, Thomas wasn't there, didn't hear it or read about it and because of that its not true.... :lol
<div class='quotetop'>(SithLord @ Sep 28 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]1327990[/snapback]</div>
He is also miscontruing what Andrew told him....and everyone...that he did not have the original molds for the armor. That's common knowledge, but Matt presents it as if Andrew has no molds whatsoever. Matt knows exactly what AA has and failed to mention it in regard to the armor. For the record, I have doubts about the armor....I agree that AA might have copied some parts. But there's no doubt in my mind about the helmets.
[/b]
Wow, your so smart to know everything Matt does, maybe AA should have had you defend him. Oh thats right, he never showed up.