Scarface Remake

Discussion in 'Entertainment and Movie Talk' started by SofaKing01, Mar 20, 2015.

  1. SofaKing01

    SofaKing01 Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    3,660
  2. glunark

    glunark Sr Member

    Trophy Points:
    1,990
    I wonder if there will be an Al Pacino cameo?
     
  3. Apollo

    Apollo Legendary Member RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

    Trophy Points:
    5,035
    Need another what 20 years for this one! :lol
     
  4. Solo4114

    Solo4114 Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    4,470
    I mean, the 80s one is itself a remake, so....meh. Can't really care much one way or the other.
     
    Rupert_Angier, Riceball and Bryancd like this.
  5. Bryancd

    Bryancd Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    3,985
    that at was my thought as well, it's not an original story.
     
  6. astroboy

    astroboy Master Member RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

    Trophy Points:
    3,275
    Saw this for the first time recently.

    Not a fan
     
  7. Jedifyfe

    Jedifyfe Master Member RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

    Trophy Points:
    4,550
    Next thing you know, they will remake Psycho.....oh wait.
     
    Solo4114 and Riceball like this.
  8. Mr_Creepy

    Mr_Creepy Sr Member RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

    Trophy Points:
    1,341
    If the scuttlebutt about basing it on the Mexican cartels is true, I wonder if it will upset Mexican-Americans as much as the '82 version * off the Cuban-Americans...:unsure
     
  9. dascoyne

    dascoyne Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    3,175
    Yeah but both versions have instant credibility because the 1932 version was a Howard Hawks film and the 1983 version was a Brian De Palma film.
    If the next iteration is a Scorsesse or Tarantino film I'd be OK with that.
     
    Apollo likes this.
  10. 0neiros

    0neiros Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    2,790
    How about we make Scarface a Woman. Sarah Silverman IS Scarface. She already belts out the F-word with Gusto. Justin Bieber can be her Vapid Boytoy.
     
    Apollo and Riceball like this.
  11. CB2001

    CB2001 Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    3,155
  12. Apollo

    Apollo Legendary Member RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

    Trophy Points:
    5,035
    Ju got it Mang!



     
    gunnerk19 likes this.
  13. CB2001

    CB2001 Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    3,155
    I still prefer the Howard Hawks film. The remake, I couldn't even sit through all of the first act (seriously, it was just way too out there to keep up with).

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 8, 2018
  14. batguy

    batguy Sr Member

    Trophy Points:
    1,990
    The '83 movie was never a favorite of mine but it's perfect at what it tried to be. Gotta give it that.

    The two strong points were Al Pacino OWNING the lead role, and the generally uncompromising & dark tone. Neither of those are likely to be repeated this time.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2015
  15. Solo4114

    Solo4114 Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    4,470
    I'm not so sure. The big issue with the '83 version was (if I recall correctly) that it implied all Cuban "boat people" were potential Scarfaces. With this, I'd figure that they'd make it clear that isn't the case so as not to tick off a good portion of the U.S. population of paying moviegoers.

    Also, here's hoping that if it is a Mexican-focused film, they cast an actual Mexican or Mexican-American actor. I'm sure there are plenty of talented Mexican actors they could pick, rather than, say, "Brad Pitt in brownface."

    Pacino brings the emotion to the role, but the thing that has always, always, always bugged me is his accent. It's SO over the top. Really, all the white actors trying to play Spanish-speakers...it's just...difficult to listen to.
     
    Riceball likes this.
  16. dascoyne

    dascoyne Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    3,175
    Not just over the top ... the accent is just awful. It's the one thing that really bothers me about the film. But Pacino chews scenery with such relish that I usually forget he's supposed to play a Cuban.
     
  17. batguy

    batguy Sr Member

    Trophy Points:
    1,990
    I don't know the Cuban sound well enough to know the accuracy of Pacino's accent. But in terms of sheer heavy-ness of it, IMO it's not bad.

    There's a phenomenon with familiar actors where even a little accent goes a long way in our minds. Look at Nic Cage in "Con Air" - the accent seemed really heavy & bad & overdone. But it's not really inaccurate for the character, it's just farther-out than we want to hear from our movie stars. I have met some deep rural southern guys whos accents really do sound as "overdone" as Cage's accent in that movie.
     
  18. cayman shen

    cayman shen Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    3,080
    I think the Pacino movie is wildly over-rated, and it is itself a remake. Guess I can't get worked up about this. Either that, or Hollywood has finally broken me.
     
  19. gizmo

    gizmo Sr Member RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Meh.....




    Ben
     
  20. Solo4114

    Solo4114 Master Member

    Trophy Points:
    4,470
    Here's the thing, though. Doing an extreme accent requires both skill on the actor's part, and the ability to accurately get across the regionality of the accent. Like, Natalie Portman's "British" accent is ATROCIOUS because it's not really "from" anywhere. It doesn't track to an RP accent, it doesn't track to any region, let alone any sub-region (e.g. "the sorth" vs. "estuarial" vs. "East London"). It's just "here's what an American thinks British people kinda sound like." To be fair, a lot of English actors do the same thing when they do the "hard-R generic American" accent. Very few actually manage to pull off a convincing American accent, let alone a regionalized one.

    But if you're gonna do it, ****ing do it right, ya know? If you're going to try to take on a Southern accent, root it somewhere. Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Kentucky, these places don't sound alike, and they can get even more particular depending on where in the given state you go.


    All that said, you do have a point. Cage's accent might actually be from some parish in Louisiana (other than New Orleans). But you don't believe that it's supposed to be, because it's just some doofy "big 'splosions" action flick that you're not really taking seriously, so why would Cage take his accent all that seriously? Like, he's not gonna hire a dialect coach to help him nail a De Soto parish accent in a movie like this.

    With Pacino, though, he's playing a serious (if over-the-top) role, so you'd figure he'd try to take his accent seriously. And the whole thing just comes across as...ridiculous. I mean, the rest of the film is decent enough that you can get lost in the story, but Pacino's accent just yanks me right out of every scene, as do the accents of Robert Logia, and Mary Elizabeth My Hair Is Crazy In This Film.
     
  21. Mr_Creepy

    Mr_Creepy Sr Member RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

    Trophy Points:
    1,341

    I never thought it particularly painted all Cubans in a bad light, just the ones that were already criminals (or had those tendencies) before they came over. Been a while since I've watched it or the "making of" stuff, but I seem to remember DePalma (or Stone) talking about getting death threats before they even started filming. I think most of the complaints came from the more "politically vocal" ones. ;)



    I think a remake could be great (I like both the '32 and '83 versions); both were "ripped from the headlines" to use a really bad cliché :lol And definitely get real Mexican actors for it :thumbsup
     
  22. Wetwired

    Wetwired Active Member

    Trophy Points:
    341
    About the accents, I always figured they sounded bad because they were supposed to sound like a cuban that tried hard to sound american. Not that they really had an accent. Tony says in the interview at the beginning that he learned all his american from Cagney movies...
     

Share This Page