Don't know if these would help. I forgot I had these; I took them right after I finished making the interior. There are probably a few things that are no longer on the piece. Sorry about that last blurry photo...
Having seen these, I *think* that comb-shaped piece at the mouth grill is laser cut...but I can't remember.
--Don
Wow!, Thats incredible, Those Parts would be a pain to machine, Though.
Where'd everyone go ?? :lol
<echo>
K, maybe if I actually post some pics of my own progress everyone will come back ?? :lol I just haven't had time to breath. But I'm working on it. I need to get them up soon though, or everyone might think I waited to build the whole thing AFTER Don posted those fabulous pictures
Chris
Thanks again Don ! :thumbsup
I'm really starting to wonder how long this took to do originally?? When I started, I wasn't intimidated in the least. In retrospect, I can say now that I wouldn't do it again. Ever :lol
Don? Mind if I ask how long this project took (collectively)? Or better yet, would you tells us?
Chris
You're welcome.
I can't honestly remember...if I were to guess--about 2-1/2 weeks. Mike Jobe made the castings, then I started cutting them up to make the mask. I would imagine he took a couple days--maybe more. Cutting it would only have taken a couple days. The drawings for the laser cut parts and greebly application probably took a week, then painting this and that--I know I was crunched for time, so John Duncan took over the interior chin section (I did the exterior of the lower part). Simultaneously, Scott McNamara made the mounts and mechanism to simulate it lowering, and then I helped Carol Bauman do the final black paint job and clear coat.
Yeah, probably about 2 1/2 weeks...maybe three.
--Don
I've been meaning to ask. I grazed over it in one of my previous comments. Why is it that it was decided to show so little of the interior of this mask in filming ? I mean, were you told it was going to be like this, or did you get surprised later when you saw the first cut of the film?
Sorry if I'm making you feel like you're being "interviewed". It just gives more life to this piece, having some story behind it. I can't be the only one wanting to know though :lol
Best,
Chris
I never mind questions, as long as everyone plays nice.
The shot as it was in the film is what was planned. We knew how long it would be on camera; I was a bit surprised as how dark it was. However, the bigger surprise was how distorted it was, since Kim Marks (the director of photography for the sequence) tried to match the original concept art. Ryan Church, the conceptual artist, took an exterior view of the Vader mask and painted over it, creating the design concept for the inside. Problem was that his proportions were whacked, so it couldn't resemble the art--nor the angle that the art tried to re-create. Kim did his best and had to use a really wide lens and get in nice and tight, and pretty near "fish-eyed" the whole piece. I remember we tried tilting it and playing with the angle so it would look more sinister.
I wasn't too worried about it's length of time onscreen or it's darkness...I knew it was an iconic piece, and it would be viewed in an exhibition one day, and that satisfied my artistic pride. This was one of the few pieces that I really felt connected to when creating it--most of the other stuff is really just work for hire that I'm indifferent to. I've worked on stuff for months only to have it blown up or crushed or thrown away--or cut from the film entirely. Can't really get attached to things in this business...
--Don
Gosh, guys...you're making me blush...:$
I'm going to go an walk on some water now...
--Don
Does this really mean that this project cost you an arm or a leg ??
:rolleyes
--Don
Howdy Don...Long time no speak...
Since you mentioned the tusks, I thought I would throw in my side of that story...
Jason