The original Terminator had some extremely dodgy effects, too.I love T2, it is one of the most memorable cinema-going experiences of my childhood (second to only Jurassic Park), but, really, it is just a watered-down recap of the first. Except Jim added those ridiculous "cute" moments, as well as FX that haven't stood the test of time, to make sure you could differentiate between the two.
The original Terminator had some extremely dodgy effects, too.
Like the awful stop-motion T-800 shambling about at the end of Terminator. Talk about not standing the test of time, that's a classic example.
EDIT: Although the faults in FX in the first Terminator are understandable, as it had an absolutely tiny budget
Yes, without Connor there would be no Skynet and without Skynet there would be no Connor. Though... you wouldn't be able to go back to alter anything - it is a self-fulfilling cycle of events that cannot turn out in any other way than what we saw in T1.Actually, that sounds more like the T-Meg from the "Terminator 2: 3-D" stunt show from Universal, which James Cameron did have a hand in (he even designed the T-70s for the show).
And, honestly, I would like the idea of John Connor allowing his mother to die, thus allowing him to die as well, since without John Connor, Skynet wouldn't exist. And without Skynet, Connor wouldn't exist. I would love to see that Skynet succeeds in their plan, only to realize too late that without Connor, it doesn't exist (and before all you guys go into the "Skynet would have been made anyway" argument, think of it like this: Cyberdyne Systems would not have developed the microprocessor that would be used by Skynet if the T-800 wasn't destroyed in the factory. We see a deleted scene of two employees discovering the processor and this is even more elaborated on in "Terminator 2." If Skynet sent a Terminator back in time and Reese didn't go, the T-800 kills Sarah Connor. John Connor ceases to exist, Skynet ceases to exist because there was no reason for the T-800 to be sent back in time and end up in the Cyberdyne factory, thus not getting smashed, thus the technology isn't discovered by Cyberdyne and developed to create the processor to create Skynet. John Connor and Skynet need each other to exist, that is obvious. Without either one of them, they both fail to exist. Unfortunately, John's too selfish to realize it and Skynet is not smart enough realize it either).
I guess you didn't watch the movie. There are several clues in the movie that shows your deduction to be wrong... the most notable being the photograph of Sarah.It's like BTTF. Once the events in T1 happened, it altered the intended timeline & created a new timeline. The moment Reese went into the past, his presence had changed the future.. But because Reece was from the initial timeline, he couldn't have been aware of the new timeline he was helping create.
I know, time travel movies can get a little confusing. That's when you need to kinda switch inner geek mode off, and just enjoy the damn thing!![]()
Sounds like a reboot - and I'm pretty much sick of reboots....
ahhh, I thought you'd start over with T1 - ok, thats different.
Yes, wouldn't ever wanna ignore T1. Just perfection. The rest... pales in comparison.ahhh, I thought you'd start over with T1 - ok, thats different.